down publishes big time. Have
> also tried heartbeat and that did help, but this is initiated by the client
> and I would like to see if haproxy can manage this. I.e. close all sessions
> on a node that is marked as DOWN.
>
> On 17/01/2014 8:09 pm, "Dmitriy Samsonov"
>
Hi!
That's related to rabbiit's default heartbeat timeout. You can set it to
lower value when connecting. Also there is a way to check if message was
actually delivered to the broker, take a look at rabbiit's docs.
пятница, 17 января 2014 г. пользователь Andrei Chevenkov написал:
> Hi,
>
> I am
No, this DDoS was from different IPs in 40-50 countries, so it was performed
by zombies. As far as I can tell it was performed with Agressor2.0 botnet,
successor of DirtyJump3.0. This botnet is constructed to let even 3 y.o.
attacker to make serious imact. Each bot not only performs 'http-flood', b
Hi!
2011/7/26 Willy Tarreau
> > There is an option in Del''s servers to install Intel's 10Gbit
> > NIC - it is working a way faster (x3, x5) then broadcom.
>
> Intel's 10G NICs are fast, but generally hard to tune, you have a hard
> trade-off between data rate and latency. Basically you tune t
run
haproxy on to serve lot's of HTTP requests 99% percent of which are trash to
be blocked?
2011/7/20 Willy Tarreau
> Hi Dmitriy,
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 06:33:27AM +0400, Dmitriy Samsonov wrote:
> > Very strange, but your experience is enourmous so I'd be better to li
Hi!
If you were running with hyperthreading, then it's very likely that the
> working cores were polluted by other activity on their siblings. In our
> appliances we manage to reach high perf even with HT left enabled, just
> because we are very careful to bind only the first thread of each real
>
buting irqs on second core. Also I'm going to try to remove MSI
support when loading bnx2. I have almost no hope to see 100k here, but
I'm just curios:)
2011/7/19 Willy Tarreau
>
> Hi Dmitriy,
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 04:25:29AM +0400, Dmitriy Samsonov wrote:
>
Hi!
>
> Fine, this is a lot better now. Since you're running at 2000 concurrent
> connections, the impact on the cache is noticeable (at 32kB per connection
> for haproxy, it's 64MB of RAM possibly touched each second, maybe only 16MB
> since requests are short and fit in a single page). Could you
Hi!
2011/7/18 Willy Tarreau
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 06:42:54AM +0400, Dmitriy Samsonov wrote:
> > My test setup is three Dell r410 servers (dual Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650
> @
> > 2.67GHz - 24 threads total, 128Gb RAM) all connected to 1Gbps network.
>
My test setup is three Dell r410 servers (dual Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @
2.67GHz - 24 threads total, 128Gb RAM) all connected to 1Gbps network.
One server is haproxy, configured to block all requests with
'Accept-Encoding: none':
global
daemon
maxconn 8
option forwardfor
retries 10
fro
10 matches
Mail list logo
