This works as expected. Thank you!
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:hapr...@elyograg.org]
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 02:39
To: HAProxy
Cc: Jim Gronowski
Subject: Re: health checks with SNI/virtual hosts
On 7/23/2015 3:20 PM, Jim Gronowski wrote:
> I’m trying to do hea
.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 14:26
To: Jim Gronowski; haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: health checks with SNI/virtual hosts
I believe you need 1.6-dev3 for that:
http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/configuration-1.6.html#5.2-sni
Jim Gronowski schreef op 23-7-2015 om 23:20:
I'm trying to d
I'm trying to do health checks on a site that is served with SNI - so going
directly to the IP generates a 404 - the backend server is looking for the
hostname to determine which site to send it to.
Is it correct to put the full URL in the httpchk section, like so?
__
I’m not very familiar with the map function, but does hdr_end(host) work in
this context?
If so, in order to only match *.foo.com and not blahfoo.com, you’d need to
include the dot in your map – ‘.foo.com’ instead of ‘foo.com’.
From: David Reuss [mailto:shuffle...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, J
Please post your redacted HAproxy config. My guess is that HAproxy and apache
are both configured to listen on the same ports. Since everything is on one
machine, you’ll have to use unique port numbers.
From: Morten-PC [mailto:maros.gr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2015 13:20
To: hap
Good day, everyone.
I'm using HAproxy in front of a redis sentinel cluster. If has worked very
well, but this morning I ran into a small problem. The sentinel cluster
elected a new master, and HAproxy correctly detected the change and updated
accordingly (new connections went to the correct
Keepalives did the trick. Cheers!
From: Nathan Williams [mailto:nath.e.w...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 16:02
To: Jim Gronowski
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: timeout values for redis?
i should probably add... setting all members to backups means of course that
only the
check inter 1s
server A-redis-02 X:6379 maxconn 1024 check inter 1s
server B-redis-01 X:6379 maxconn 1024 check inter 1s
server B-redis-02 X:6379 maxconn 1024 check inter 1s
Jim Gronowski
Network Administrator
DiTronics, LLC.
Ditronics, LLC email disclaimer:
This communica
> Hi Lukas :
>
> - Thanks for the reply.
> - We have a (A) node for example that will stream tcp data towards a
> mediation B node.
> - The A node only can support 1 destionation IP address and tcp port.
> - In our case we have 3 mediation nodes (B , C and D).
I haven't done it myself, but wouldn'
: Jeff Zellner [mailto:j...@olark.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 17:58
To: Jim Gronowski
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: balance source and weighted records
Hey Jim,
Here's the pertinent section from the docs
(http://cbonte.github.com/haproxy-dconv/configuration-1.4.html#4-balance
)
Can someone provide some insight into what's happening when balancing
based on source? Is it consistent across different haproxy instances?
For example, in a simple setup with one frontend balancing between two
backends, A and B - does balance source send 0.0.0.0-127.255.255.255 to
backend A and
We have a server setup as follows:
listen MyService X.X.X.X:XX
mode tcp
option tcplog
option redispatch
balance source
maxconn 5000
option ssl-hello-chk
server server1 X.X.X.X maxconn 500 check
server server2 X.X.
12 matches
Mail list logo