Re: Easy but useful feature missing, anyone interested ?

Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi all, > while revisiting pending issues, I've come across this one, about > the impossibility for an environment variable to produce multiple > words in the configuration: > https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/165 > It can be trivially addressed by adding

Re: Easy but useful feature missing, anyone interested ?

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 08:40:40AM +0200, Amaury Denoyelle wrote: > At the moment I'm always interested to add simple feature, but I also > would like to progress with my patch serie on stats so I'm not sure if I > will have the time for this :/ Yes please, I'd like to merge your final stats

Re: Easy but useful feature missing, anyone interested ?

Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi all, > while revisiting pending issues, I've come across this one, about > the impossibility for an environment variable to produce multiple > words in the configuration: > https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/165 > It can be trivially addressed by adding

Easy but useful feature missing, anyone interested ?

Hi all, while revisiting pending issues, I've come across this one, about the impossibility for an environment variable to produce multiple words in the configuration: https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/165 It can be trivially addressed by adding support for ${VAR[*]} to the config