On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 01:24:04PM -0300, Joao Morais wrote:
>
>
> > Em 15 de set de 2020, à(s) 12:36, William Lallemand
> > escreveu:
> >
> > Oh right... the space in "[was: ]" is troublesome for cutting the string,
> > we must remove it.
>
> It's not a problem at all when using chunks of
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 06:43:11PM +0100, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 16:42, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
>
> > Why not use the Tab (0x09) as separator and make the output a proper TSV?
>
>
> I’m only 2% joking when I point out that ASCII already has single-byte
> inter-field and
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 05:39:18PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> William,
>
> Am 15.09.20 um 17:36 schrieb William Lallemand:
> > Oh right... the space in "[was: ]" is troublesome for cutting the string,
> > we must remove it.
> >
>
> Why not use the Tab (0x09) as separator and make the output
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 16:42, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Why not use the Tab (0x09) as separator and make the output a proper TSV?
I’m only 2% joking when I point out that ASCII already has single-byte
inter-field and inter-record delimiters defined, just waiting to be used
... :-)
> Em 15 de set de 2020, à(s) 12:36, William Lallemand
> escreveu:
>
> Oh right... the space in "[was: ]" is troublesome for cutting the string,
> we must remove it.
It's not a problem at all when using chunks of fixed size, even if columns
differ between them, and the lay out ([was: ...])
William,
Am 15.09.20 um 17:36 schrieb William Lallemand:
> Oh right... the space in "[was: ]" is troublesome for cutting the string,
> we must remove it.
>
Why not use the Tab (0x09) as separator and make the output a proper TSV?
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:52:15AM -0300, Joao Morais wrote:
>
>
> > Em 14 de set de 2020, à(s) 19:14, William Lallemand
> > escreveu:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:09:21PM -0300, Joao Morais wrote:
> >> Hello list, I'm working on an automation around haproxy process
> >>
> Em 14 de set de 2020, à(s) 19:14, William Lallemand
> escreveu:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:09:21PM -0300, Joao Morais wrote:
>> Hello list, I'm working on an automation around haproxy process
>> lifecycle in master-worker mode. It's working nice but I'm not
>> confident
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:09:21PM -0300, Joao Morais wrote:
> Hello list, I'm working on an automation around haproxy process
> lifecycle in master-worker mode. It's working nice but I'm not
> confident that all premisses I used are correct. Please provide some
> guidance if I did any
Hello list, I'm working on an automation around haproxy process lifecycle in
master-worker mode. It's working nice but I'm not confident that all premisses
I used are correct. Please provide some guidance if I did any wrong assumption,
RTFM link is welcome as usual.
First of all I figured
10 matches
Mail list logo