Re: check successful reload using master cli

2020-09-16 Thread William Lallemand
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 01:24:04PM -0300, Joao Morais wrote: > > > > Em 15 de set de 2020, à(s) 12:36, William Lallemand > > escreveu: > > > > Oh right... the space in "[was: ]" is troublesome for cutting the string, > > we must remove it. > > It's not a problem at all when using chunks of

Re: check successful reload using master cli

2020-09-16 Thread William Lallemand
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 06:43:11PM +0100, Jonathan Matthews wrote: > On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 16:42, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > > > Why not use the Tab (0x09) as separator and make the output a proper TSV? > > > I’m only 2% joking when I point out that ASCII already has single-byte > inter-field and

Re: check successful reload using master cli

2020-09-16 Thread William Lallemand
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 05:39:18PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > William, > > Am 15.09.20 um 17:36 schrieb William Lallemand: > > Oh right... the space in "[was: ]" is troublesome for cutting the string, > > we must remove it. > > > > Why not use the Tab (0x09) as separator and make the output

Re: check successful reload using master cli

2020-09-15 Thread Jonathan Matthews
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 16:42, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > Why not use the Tab (0x09) as separator and make the output a proper TSV? I’m only 2% joking when I point out that ASCII already has single-byte inter-field and inter-record delimiters defined, just waiting to be used ... :-)

Re: check successful reload using master cli

2020-09-15 Thread Joao Morais
> Em 15 de set de 2020, à(s) 12:36, William Lallemand > escreveu: > > Oh right... the space in "[was: ]" is troublesome for cutting the string, > we must remove it. It's not a problem at all when using chunks of fixed size, even if columns differ between them, and the lay out ([was: ...])

Re: check successful reload using master cli

2020-09-15 Thread Tim Düsterhus
William, Am 15.09.20 um 17:36 schrieb William Lallemand: > Oh right... the space in "[was: ]" is troublesome for cutting the string, > we must remove it. > Why not use the Tab (0x09) as separator and make the output a proper TSV? Best regards Tim Düsterhus

Re: check successful reload using master cli

2020-09-15 Thread William Lallemand
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:52:15AM -0300, Joao Morais wrote: > > > > Em 14 de set de 2020, à(s) 19:14, William Lallemand > > escreveu: > > > > Hello, > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:09:21PM -0300, Joao Morais wrote: > >> Hello list, I'm working on an automation around haproxy process > >>

Re: check successful reload using master cli

2020-09-15 Thread Joao Morais
> Em 14 de set de 2020, à(s) 19:14, William Lallemand > escreveu: > > Hello, > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:09:21PM -0300, Joao Morais wrote: >> Hello list, I'm working on an automation around haproxy process >> lifecycle in master-worker mode. It's working nice but I'm not >> confident

Re: check successful reload using master cli

2020-09-14 Thread William Lallemand
Hello, On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:09:21PM -0300, Joao Morais wrote: > Hello list, I'm working on an automation around haproxy process > lifecycle in master-worker mode. It's working nice but I'm not > confident that all premisses I used are correct. Please provide some > guidance if I did any

check successful reload using master cli

2020-09-14 Thread Joao Morais
Hello list, I'm working on an automation around haproxy process lifecycle in master-worker mode. It's working nice but I'm not confident that all premisses I used are correct. Please provide some guidance if I did any wrong assumption, RTFM link is welcome as usual. First of all I figured