Tim,
> Partial responses should not happen with TCP being used. I didn't follow
> along with all the DNS stuff, but does the resolver support TCP by now
> or is it still limited to UDP?
Using TCP doesn't avoid the truncation, it only delays the problem to a
higher limit. From
Willy,
On 3/31/22 08:31, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Can you clarify what *exactly* is expected to be removed and what will
remain? Is it just SRV DNS records or more?
watchdog was triggered due to this, and in my opinion the concept is
fundamentally flawed since responses are often partial. As soon
Hi Alex,
On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 08:30:56PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> I fully agree with "using DNS for service discovery is a disaster." and the
> DNS
> was the easiest way in the past for service discovery.
>
> A possible solution could be that there is a registration API in HAProxy
Hi Tim,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 09:14:42PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Willy,
>
> On 3/26/22 10:22, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > be the last LTS version with this. I'm interested in opinions and feedback
> > about this. And the next question will obviously be "how could we detect
>
> Can you
Willy,
On 3/26/22 10:22, Willy Tarreau wrote:
be the last LTS version with this. I'm interested in opinions and feedback
about this. And the next question will obviously be "how could we detect
Can you clarify what *exactly* is expected to be removed and what will
remain? Is it just SRV DNS
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 12:09:22AM +0500, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> сб, 26 мар. 2022 г. в 22:23, Ionel GARDAIS >:
> > Thanks Willy for these updates.
> >
> > While skimming the result on the interop website, I was surprised that
> > haproxy is always more than 50% slower than its competitor.
> > Is
On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 08:49:14PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hello Willy,
>
> On Sat, 26 Mar 2022 at 10:22, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > A change discussed around previous announce was made in the H2 mux: the
> > "timeout http-keep-alive" and "timeout http-request" are now respected
> > and work
Hello Willy,
On Sat, 26 Mar 2022 at 10:22, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> A change discussed around previous announce was made in the H2 mux: the
> "timeout http-keep-alive" and "timeout http-request" are now respected
> and work as documented, so that it will finally be possible to force such
>
Hi Willy.
On Sat, 26 Mar 2022 10:22:02 +0100
Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> HAProxy 2.6-dev4 was released on 2022/03/26. It added 80 new commits
> after version 2.6-dev3.
>
> The activity started to calm down a bit, which is good because we're
> roughly 2 months before the release and it will
gging
> process for the runs ?
>
looks like this dockerfile is used
https://github.com/haproxytech/haproxy-qns/blob/master/Dockerfile
>
> Ionel
>
> - Mail original -
> De: "Willy Tarreau"
> À: "haproxy"
> Envoyé: Samedi 26 Mars 202
: "Willy Tarreau"
À: "haproxy"
Envoyé: Samedi 26 Mars 2022 10:22:02
Objet: [*EXT*] [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-2.6-dev4
Hi,
HAProxy 2.6-dev4 was released on 2022/03/26. It added 80 new commits
after version 2.6-dev3.
The activity started to calm down a bit, which is good because we
Hi,
HAProxy 2.6-dev4 was released on 2022/03/26. It added 80 new commits
after version 2.6-dev3.
The activity started to calm down a bit, which is good because we're
roughly 2 months before the release and it will become important to avoid
introducing last-minute regressions.
This version
12 matches
Mail list logo
