Hi Conrad,
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:12:00AM +0200, Conrad Hoffmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> attached are the first two patches, one fixing the actual bug I
> encountered and one just tidying up the signal handling a little. More
> to come.
>
> Are they ok like this?
Perfect, thank you very much fo
Hello,
attached are the first two patches, one fixing the actual bug I
encountered and one just tidying up the signal handling a little. More
to come.
Are they ok like this?
Cheers,
Conrad
On 07/25/2014 11:04 AM, Conrad Hoffmann wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On 07/25/2014 08:31 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>>
Hey,
On 07/25/2014 08:31 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>> There was only one small bug really, but once I got going I thought i
>> might as well simplify it a litle. I pulled everything out of the signal
>> handlers, switched from signal() to sigaction(), got rid of global state
>> and got rid of the w
Hi Conrad,
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 03:34:39AM +0200, Conrad Hoffmann wrote:
> Hey Willy,
>
> I know you're not that much into the systemd stuff, but although we
> don't use systemd we actually us the wrapper a lot, and I thought it
> could use a little make-over.
OK.
> There was only one small
offmann
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 02:58:51 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Improve and simplify systemd-wrapper.
The signal handling did too much work in the context of the signal
handler, which didn't yet cause problems (for me) but is to be
avoided. While at it I switched from the deprecated signal()
5 matches
Mail list logo
