On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 04:25:17AM +, mizuta.take...@fujitsu.com wrote:
> Hi, Willy,
>
> Thank you for your support.
> Sorry for not considering other platforms.
No worries, that's exactly part of the reasons I preferred to merge this
after the 2.2 release :-)
Willy
Re: [PATCH] MEDIUM: Support TCP keepalive parameters
> customization
>
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 04:42:29AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 02:21:32AM +, mizuta.take...@fujitsu.com
> wrote:
> > > I have attached a patch with dual-sided tcpka-* remov
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 04:42:29AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 02:21:32AM +, mizuta.take...@fujitsu.com wrote:
> > I have attached a patch with dual-sided tcpka-* removed.
>
> OK thank you, that's perfect, I'm taking it now!
Bah, we obviously broke non-linux builds,
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 02:21:32AM +, mizuta.take...@fujitsu.com wrote:
> Hi, Willy,
>
> > Given that even in the doc you strongly suggested to use only clika-* and
> > srvka-*, I'd rather kill the dual-sided tcpka-* before they start to be
> > used.
>
> Thank you for your suggestion!
>
>
akeshi/水田 健司
> Cc: 'haproxy@formilux.org'
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] MEDIUM: Support TCP keepalive parameters
> customization
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 03:01:26AM +, mizuta.take...@fujitsu.com
> wrote:
> > Hi, Willy,
> >
> > Thank you for your
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 03:01:26AM +, mizuta.take...@fujitsu.com wrote:
> Hi, Willy,
>
> Thank you for your quick reply!
>
> > But I mean, that's probably OK and I won't argue on this. I'd be
> > interested in others' opinions and/or suggestions on this, but
> > it's not critical.
>
>
MIZUTA Takeshi
> -Original Message-
> From: Willy Tarreau
> Sent: Saturday, July 4, 2020 3:08 AM
> To: Mizuta, Takeshi/水田 健司
> Cc: 'haproxy@formilux.org'
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] MEDIUM: Support TCP keepalive parameters
> customization
>
> Hi Takeshi,
>
> On F
Hi Takeshi,
On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 11:21:59AM +, mizuta.take...@fujitsu.com wrote:
> Dear maintainers,
>
> Thank you for discussing issue#670 on github.
> https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/670
>
> I have attached a patch that resolves the issue.
> (I have changed the config keyword
Dear maintainers,
Thank you for discussing issue#670 on github.
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/670
I have attached a patch that resolves the issue.
(I have changed the config keyword from the commit on github.)
Would you please comment on the patch?
Documentation and test code will
9 matches
Mail list logo
