Hi Alex,
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 11:43:26AM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Attached the new patch.
Thank you, it went OK on the CI so we don't even need to refine the
list of targets for now. I've just merged it as-is.
Many thanks for your fast update and for the reminder!
Willy
: Add bc_rtt and bc_rttvar
This Patch adds fetch samples for backends round trip time.
---
doc/configuration.txt| 16 ++
reg-tests/sample_fetches/tcpinfo_rtt.vtc | 39
src/tcp_sample.c | 32 +++
3 files
Hi Will.
On 28.04.23 11:07, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Alex,
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 10:59:46AM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
Hi Willy.
On 30.03.23 06:23, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 06:16:34AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Alex,
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 04:06:10PM +0200,
Hi Alex,
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 10:59:46AM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Hi Willy.
>
> On 30.03.23 06:23, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 06:16:34AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 04:06:10PM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> >
Hi Willy.
On 30.03.23 06:23, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 06:16:34AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Alex,
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 04:06:10PM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
Ping?
thanks for the ping, I missed it a few times when being busy with some
painful bugs in the past.
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 06:16:34AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 04:06:10PM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> > Ping?
>
> thanks for the ping, I missed it a few times when being busy with some
> painful bugs in the past. I've pushed it to a topic branch to
Hi Alex,
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 04:06:10PM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Ping?
thanks for the ping, I missed it a few times when being busy with some
painful bugs in the past. I've pushed it to a topic branch to verify
what it does on the CI for non-linux OS; we might have to add a
"feature
Ping?
On 10.01.23 21:27, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
On 09.12.22 13:17, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
Hi.
As I still think that the Balancing algorithm (Peak) EWMA (
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/1570 ) could help to make a
"better" decision to which server should the request be send,
Hi.
Any chance to add this Patch?
Regards
Alex
On 10.01.23 21:27, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
On 09.12.22 13:17, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
Hi.
As I still think that the Balancing algorithm (Peak) EWMA (
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/1570 ) could help to make a
"better" decision to
0e65d7dbc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aleksandar Lazic
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 13:05:52 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] MINOR: sample: Add bc_rtt and bc_rttvar
This Patch adds the fetch sample for backends round trip time.
---
doc/configuration.txt| 16 ++
reg-tests/sample_fet
Hi,
Any feedback to that patch?
On 09.12.22 13:17, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
Hi.
As I still think that the Balancing algorithm (Peak) EWMA (
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/1570 ) could help to make a
"better" decision to which server should the request be send, here the
beginning
bject: [PATCH] MINOR: sample: Add bc_rtt and bc_rttvar
To be able to implement "Balancing algorithm (Peak) EWMA" is it
necessary to know the round trip time to the backend.
This Patch adds the fetch sample for the backend server.
Part of GH https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/15
12 matches
Mail list logo
