Hi Christopher,
Thanks for the review.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 10:21 AM Christopher Faulet wrote:
> So, it may be good to take a global look at this stuff. I may missed
> something.
> And be carefull for the backports because the health-checks were refactored in
> the 2.2.
ok I will come back w
Le 31/01/2021 à 11:11, William Dauchy a écrit :
while reading `update_server_addr_port` I found out some things which
can be seen as incoherency. I hope I did not overlooked anything:
- one comment is stating check's address should be updated if it uses
the server one; however the condition c
while reading `update_server_addr_port` I found out some things which
can be seen as incoherency. I hope I did not overlooked anything:
- one comment is stating check's address should be updated if it uses
the server one; however the condition checks if `SRV_F_CHECKADDR` is
set; this flag is s
3 matches
Mail list logo
