On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 08:40:03PM +0200, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
> Here is a new series of patches.
Looks good, all applied now, thank you Fred!
Willy
On 10/25/2018 07:01 PM, William Lallemand wrote:
Hi Fred!
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:59:43AM +0200, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
Well, after having checked, haproxy could start with a cache bigger than
2047 MB on my PC due to parsing issue.
I provide three patches. The first fixes the "total-max-s
Hi Fred!
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:59:43AM +0200, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
> Well, after having checked, haproxy could start with a cache bigger than
> 2047 MB on my PC due to parsing issue.
>
> I provide three patches. The first fixes the "total-max-size" parsing
> issue. The second patch is
On 10/24/2018 04:49 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Fred,
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 02:57:05PM +0200, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
Hello ML,
Here is a serie of patches to make the cache capable of caching HTTP
objects larger than a buffer.
The 4th patch add "max-object-size" option to "cache" section s
Hi Fred,
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 02:57:05PM +0200, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
> Hello ML,
>
> Here is a serie of patches to make the cache capable of caching HTTP
> objects larger than a buffer.
>
> The 4th patch add "max-object-size" option to "cache" section so that
> to limit the size of the HT
Hello ML,
Here is a serie of patches to make the cache capable of caching HTTP
objects larger than a buffer.
The 4th patch add "max-object-size" option to "cache" section so that
to limit the size of the HTTP objects to be cached.
Do not hesitate to test them.
Regards,
Fred.
>From 999ed7a5d070
6 matches
Mail list logo