Le 04/12/2017 à 11:12, Максим Куприянов a écrit :
Hi!
Everything seems fine. Haproxy is still alive, so your patch solves the
problem.
Thank you!
Nice, Thanks for your report.
--
Christopher Faulet
Hi!
Everything seems fine. Haproxy is still alive, so your patch solves the
problem.
Thank you!
Maxim
2017-12-02 13:22 GMT+03:00 Максим Куприянов :
> Hi!
>
> Thank you for such a quick response. I'll apply patch and leave one
> instance of 1.8 under load till Monday. Than I'll write you back.
Hi Christopher,
On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 10:24:11AM +0100, Christopher Faulet wrote:
> Thanks for your detailed report. There is a bug in the sync-point, when the
> same thread requests a synchronization many times. And, it is easier to
> encountered this bug with only one thread.
>
> Could you ch
Hi!
Thank you for such a quick response. I'll apply patch and leave one
instance of 1.8 under load till Monday. Than I'll write you back.
Le 02/12/2017 à 08:23, Максим Куприянов a écrit :
Hi!
Tonight all of mine haproxy 1.8.0 instances stopped answering. They
didn't forward traffic and even didn't answered over socket. They're
compiled with threads, but threads are not enabled in they configs (no
nbthread option). All of them s
Hi!
Tonight all of mine haproxy 1.8.0 instances stopped answering. They didn't
forward traffic and even didn't answered over socket. They're compiled with
threads, but threads are not enabled in they configs (no nbthread option).
All of them stuck in same place:
# strace -f -p 831919
Process 83191
6 matches
Mail list logo
