On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 06:03:51PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> I thought I have misunderstood the Idea behind maglev, thanks for
> clarification.
Found another mention of Maglev [Eis16] for high-level load balancing (between
datacenters):
Am 29.12.2018 um 07:41 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 07:55:11PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> Well as far as I understood the pdf one of the biggest difference is that
>> Maglev is a distributed system where the consistent hash is for local system.
>
> No, not at all. The
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 07:55:11PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Well as far as I understood the pdf one of the biggest difference is that
> Maglev is a distributed system where the consistent hash is for local system.
No, not at all. The difference is that it's designed for packet processing
Von: Aaron West
Gesendet: 28. Dezember 2018 19:36:03 MEZ
An: HAProxy
Betreff: Re: Question about Maglev algorithm
I've not used it yet with IPVS because I have nothing with a new enough
Kernel (4.18+ I think), however, isn't this quite similar to HAProxy's
consistent hash options?
Aaron
I've not used it yet with IPVS because I have nothing with a new enough
Kernel (4.18+ I think), however, isn't this quite similar to HAProxy's
consistent hash options?
Aaron
Loadbalancer.org
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 07:11:24PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Have anyone take a look into the Maglev algorithm ?
>
> This paper looks very interesting
> https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en//pubs/archive/44824.pdf
Seems to be in IPVS already:
Hi.
Have anyone take a look into the Maglev algorithm ?
This paper looks very interesting
https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en//pubs/archive/44824.pdf
Regards
Aleks
7 matches
Mail list logo
