Willy,
Am 02.04.2018 um 16:46 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
Very likely not, I think that maxconn is 0 when not set, so most likely
it's a leftover from old code.
I don't feel confident touching these members (there's also a few more
which probably should be unified). If you decide to take a look a
Hi Tim,
On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 04:38:30PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Nikhil,
>
> Am 26.03.2018 um 08:07 schrieb Nikhil Kapoor:
> > Above output shows that maxconn value is "4294967295" which is taken
> > randomly.
>
> This is not random. What you are seeing is unsigned integer wrap around.
Nikhil,
Am 26.03.2018 um 08:07 schrieb Nikhil Kapoor:
Above output shows that maxconn value is "4294967295" which is taken randomly.
This is not random. What you are seeing is unsigned integer wrap around.
It's 4294967296 (2^32) added to your negative argument.
Is this a bug? If not then w
Hi,
When negative value is given for maxconn(-1,-2...-9, 10.) parameter in global
section of haproxy.cfg. It is observed that haproxy service starts with
successful health check up of backend servers.
But when larger negative value is given then haproxy fails to start and Alert
message is shown
4 matches
Mail list logo
