y Tarreau" ,
> > "Kevin Mao"
> > Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
> > Envoyé: Mardi 26 Février 2019 12:12:33
> > Objet: Re: Wrong sha256 checksum for HAProxy 1.8 and 1.9?
> >
> > Willy,
> > Cyril,
> >
> > Am 26.02.19 um 10:5
Cyril,
Am 26.02.19 um 14:10 schrieb Tim Düsterhus:
> Am 26.02.19 um 13:29 schrieb Cyril Bonté:
>> Well, this is more a browser bug than a misconfiguration. But for now, the
>> configuration requires a workaround to not use "Content-Encoding: gzip" for
>> gzipped files.
>> https://bugzilla.mozill
Hi all,
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 01:29:54PM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote:
> > De: "Tim Düsterhus"
> > À: "Cyril Bonté" , "Willy Tarreau" ,
> > "Kevin Mao"
> > Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
> > Envoyé: Mardi 26 Février 2019
Cyril,
Am 26.02.19 um 13:29 schrieb Cyril Bonté:
> Well, this is more a browser bug than a misconfiguration. But for now, the
> configuration requires a workaround to not use "Content-Encoding: gzip" for
> gzipped files.
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=610679
> https://bugzilla.mo
> De: "Tim Düsterhus"
> À: "Cyril Bonté" , "Willy Tarreau" , "Kevin
> Mao"
> Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
> Envoyé: Mardi 26 Février 2019 12:12:33
> Objet: Re: Wrong sha256 checksum for HAProxy 1.8 and 1.9?
>
> Willy,
> Cyril,
>
Willy,
Cyril,
Am 26.02.19 um 10:52 schrieb Cyril Bonté:
> Interesting, in fact the downloaded file is a gzip of the tar.gz itself.
>
Yes. This appears to be a misconfiguration in either HAProxy or Apache.
Probably Apache, because the `.tar.gz` is delivered with Content-Type
application/x-tar whi
Hi,
I can confirm the issue with haproxy-1.9.4.tar.gz and Firefox 65.0 on
Linux (Ubuntu 18.10, latest Updates).
For me the files differ already at byte 5:
Correct:
1f 8b 08 00 70 e6 5a 5c 02 03 ec 5c 5b 73 e2 48 |p.Z\...\[s.H|
0010 96 ae 67 ff 0a 6d f5 43 55 75 18 6c a8 b2 a
Hi again,
> De: "Cyril Bonté"
> À: "Willy Tarreau" , "Kevin Mao"
> Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
> Envoyé: Mardi 26 Février 2019 09:39:08
> Objet: Re: Wrong sha256 checksum for HAProxy 1.8 and 1.9?
>
> Using firefox, I'm observing the same i
Hi Willy,
Le 26/02/2019 à 07:38, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
Hi Kevin,
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 06:27:30AM +, Kevin Mao wrote:
Hi haproxy@,
It seems like the sha256 checksum's are wrong for the latest 1.8 and 1.9
HAProxy versions, Can you please confirm?
https://www.haproxy.org/download/1.9/s
Hi Kevin,
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 06:27:30AM +, Kevin Mao wrote:
> Hi haproxy@,
>
> It seems like the sha256 checksum's are wrong for the latest 1.8 and 1.9
> HAProxy versions, Can you please confirm?
> https://www.haproxy.org/download/1.9/src/,
> $ shasum -a 256 -c haproxy-1.9.4.tar.gz.sh
Hi haproxy@,
It seems like the sha256 checksum's are wrong for the latest 1.8 and 1.9
HAProxy versions, Can you please confirm?
https://www.haproxy.org/download/1.9/src/,
$ shasum -a 256 -c haproxy-1.9.4.tar.gz.sha256haproxy-1.9.4.tar.gz:
FAILEDshasum: WARNING: 1 computed checksum did NOT matc
11 matches
Mail list logo