Re: ha pool haproxy

2014-05-02 Thread Rafaela
Thanks for the replies. I opted to use the round robin, although not the best solution. tks 2014-04-09 2:58 GMT-03:00 Jarno Huuskonen jarno.huusko...@uef.fi: Hello, On Tue, Apr 08, Rafaela wrote: Tks Lukas! The threads of the list, it is not possible to climb HAproxy horizontally,

Re: ha pool haproxy

2014-05-02 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 12:46:50PM -0300, Rafaela wrote: Thanks for the replies. I opted to use the round robin, although not the best solution. RR DNS with multiple VIPs as Jarno showed is quite common, as it provides both load balancing and fault tolerance. Other people use ECMP and load

Re: ha pool haproxy

2014-04-09 Thread Jarno Huuskonen
Hello, On Tue, Apr 08, Rafaela wrote: Tks Lukas! The threads of the list, it is not possible to climb HAproxy horizontally, how to maintain availability is using the vrrp (master and slave) or dns round robin (despite losing a part of traffic if you do not have to check). Correct? My

ha pool haproxy

2014-04-08 Thread Rafaela
hi , How can I have high availability and load balancing in my HA PROXY? Using keepalived only guarantees me an online machine and is not load balancing between nodes HAproxy. The haproxy run on Linux (debian) and my backend is W2k8r2 (IIS 7.5)

RE: ha pool haproxy

2014-04-08 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hi, How can I have high availability and load balancing in my HA PROXY? Using keepalived only guarantees me an online machine and is not load balancing between nodes HAproxy. Haproxy load balances traffic and guarantess high availability for your backends. Haproxy cannot load balance its own

Re: ha pool haproxy

2014-04-08 Thread Rafaela
Tks Lukas! The threads of the list, it is not possible to climb HAproxy horizontally, how to maintain availability is using the vrrp (master and slave) or dns round robin (despite losing a part of traffic if you do not have to check). Correct? My traffic is great/high and working with virtual