Thanks, I'll check it out.
ср, 11 июл. 2018 г. в 18:20, Frederic Lecaille :
> On 07/11/2018 10:41 AM, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
> > On 07/10/2018 01:35 PM, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >
> > Hello Ilya,
> >
> >> I had an idea, what if we will run reg-tests with various sanitizers ?
> >>
> >>
On 07/11/2018 10:41 AM, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
On 07/10/2018 01:35 PM, Илья Шипицин wrote:
Hello,
Hello Ilya,
I had an idea, what if we will run reg-tests with various sanitizers ?
for example,
https://gitlab.com/chipitsine/haproxy/-/jobs/80667862
(gcc + sanitize-address).
can someone c
On 07/10/2018 01:35 PM, Илья Шипицин wrote:
Hello,
Hello Ilya,
I had an idea, what if we will run reg-tests with various sanitizers ?
for example,
https://gitlab.com/chipitsine/haproxy/-/jobs/80667862
(gcc + sanitize-address).
can someone confirm a bug there ?
I confirm there is a little
just for the record, asan was very easy to enable:
https://gitlab.com/chipitsine/haproxy/blob/master/.gitlab-ci.yml
вт, 10 июл. 2018 г. в 16:35, Илья Шипицин :
> Hello,
>
> I had an idea, what if we will run reg-tests with various sanitizers ?
>
> for example,
>
> https://gitlab.com/chipitsine/h
Hello,
I had an idea, what if we will run reg-tests with various sanitizers ?
for example,
https://gitlab.com/chipitsine/haproxy/-/jobs/80667862
(gcc + sanitize-address).
can someone confirm a bug there ?
"AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on"
I'll add more sanitizers later.
thanks for y
5 matches
Mail list logo
