Re: http-reuse always, work quite well

2016-10-27 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Brendan, On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 11:39:51AM -0400, Brendan Kearney wrote: > On 10/22/2016 02:08 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > You're welcome. Please note that the reuse mechanism is not perfect and > > can still be improved. So do not hesitate to report any issue you find, > > we definitely n

Re: http-reuse always, work quite well

2016-10-25 Thread Pavlos Parissis
On 22/10/2016 08:08 πμ, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Pavlos, > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 03:01:52PM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote: >>> I'm not surprized that always works better, but my point is that if it's >>> much better it can be useful to stay with it, but if it's only 1% better >>> it's not wort

Re: http-reuse always, work quite well

2016-10-22 Thread Brendan Kearney
On 10/22/2016 02:08 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: You're welcome. Please note that the reuse mechanism is not perfect and can still be improved. So do not hesitate to report any issue you find, we definitely need real-world feedback like this. I cannot promise that every issue will be fixed, but at l

Re: http-reuse always, work quite well

2016-10-21 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Pavlos, On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 03:01:52PM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote: > > I'm not surprized that always works better, but my point is that if it's > > much better it can be useful to stay with it, but if it's only 1% better > > it's not worth it. > > > > It is way better:-), see Marcin's r

Re: http-reuse always, work quite well

2016-10-21 Thread Pavlos Parissis
On 21/10/2016 08:14 πμ, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Pavlos, > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 08:28:34AM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote: >>> That's really great, thanks for the feedback. Have you tried the other >>> http-reuse options ? >> >> A workmate did the experimentation on http-reuse and I only know

Re: http-reuse always, work quite well

2016-10-20 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Pavlos, On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 08:28:34AM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote: > > That's really great, thanks for the feedback. Have you tried the other > > http-reuse options ? > > A workmate did the experimentation on http-reuse and I only know that 'always' > worked better for us. I will ask him

Re: http-reuse always, work quite well

2016-10-18 Thread Pavlos Parissis
On 15/10/2016 09:31 πμ, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Pavlos, > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 04:33:20PM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I just want to drop a note and mention that http-reuse works very well >> for us: >> >> % ss -t state established '( sport = :http )'|wc -l >> 2113 >> >> % ss

Re: http-reuse always, work quite well

2016-10-15 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Pavlos, On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 04:33:20PM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote: > Hi, > > I just want to drop a note and mention that http-reuse works very well > for us: > > % ss -t state established '( sport = :http )'|wc -l > 2113 > > % ss -t state established '( dport = :http )'| wc -l > 408 >

Re: http-reuse always, work quite well

2016-10-14 Thread Pavlos Parissis
On 14/10/2016 08:49 μμ, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > Hi > > Am 14-10-2016 16:33, schrieb Pavlos Parissis: >> Hi, >> >> I just want to drop a note and mention that http-reuse works very well >> for us: >> >> % ss -t state established '( sport = :http )'|wc -l >> 2113 >> >> % ss -t state established '(

Re: http-reuse always, work quite well

2016-10-14 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
Hi Am 14-10-2016 16:33, schrieb Pavlos Parissis: Hi, I just want to drop a note and mention that http-reuse works very well for us: % ss -t state established '( sport = :http )'|wc -l 2113 % ss -t state established '( dport = :http )'| wc -l 408 As, you can see connections established to bac