Re: Can HAProxy do that?

Dear Mikael, yes it is possible with haproxy. On Die 06.07.2010 21:40, zabrane Mikael wrote: Hi List, I'm new to HAProxy, so please apologize if the question was already asked before. I've a homemade web server running on my internat. It works like this. [snipp] So, my question is simple:

Testing HAproxy

Hi, My name is Anthony Porcano, and I work for 24/7 Real Media. We are evaluating HAproxy for a new application, and I wanted to inquire about any services you provide to customers taking on large installs. The volume we need to support is approximately 100k requests per second, or roughly 8 b

Re: Haproxy+Nginx SSL Insecurities

Hey guys, Thanks for the input. I ended up settling on the following configuration type: in haproxy: listen something.com bind 172.168.1.1:80 acl acl_port_80 dst_port eq 80 acl acl_secure hdr(amISecure) YES cookie SERVERID insert indirect nocache redirect

Re: Can HAProxy do that?

Thanks Aleks. I'll give it a try! 2010/7/8 Aleksandar Lazic > Dear Mikael, > > yes it is possible with haproxy. > > > On Die 06.07.2010 21:40, zabrane Mikael wrote: > >> Hi List, >> >> I'm new to HAProxy, so please apologize if the question was already >> asked before. >> >> I've a homemade web

Re: Testing HAproxy

Hi Anthony, On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 07:27:49PM +, Porcano, Anthony wrote: > Hi, > > My name is Anthony Porcano, and I work for 24/7 Real Media. We are evaluating > HAproxy for a new application, and I wanted to inquire about any services you > provide to customers taking on large installs.

Re: Truncated health check response from real servers

On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 11:37:48AM +0200, Anze wrote: > Hi all, > > We have tried upgrading our haproxy version to 1.4.8 and found than this > configuration setting fails: > http-check expect string check_is_ok > with message: > 'http-check' only supports 'disable-on-404' > > I guess the pat

Re: Testing HAproxy

wow...I totally did not mean to send that to the mailing list. Oh well. :) Thank you for the reply Willy. This was actually very helpful. Regards, Anthony On Jul 8, 2010, at 4:21 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Anthony, > > On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 07:27:49PM +, Porcano, Anthony wrote: >

Re: Buffer Size

On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 05:49:24PM +0200, Hervé COMMOWICK wrote: > Oh right, you mean adjust buffer size (to permit large cookies to > pass) per listen section. > > As i know, it is not possible at the moment. > > Maybe Willy can talk a bit about that ? :) Indeed, and I really don't think it wi

Re: Testing HAproxy

On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 08:29:01PM +, Porcano, Anthony wrote: > wow...I totally did not mean to send that to the mailing list. Oh well. :) ... but you did, it's too late now, some other mailing list archives will already have replicated the message. Anyway, there was nothing apparently sensi

Re: Testing HAproxy

All for the best. It's appropriate to give you a public thank you for creating such an excellent piece of software. I will keep in touch with our progress. Thanks, Anthony On Jul 8, 2010, at 4:33 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 08:29:01PM +, Porcano, Anthony wrote: >> w

haproxy get 502 when downloading large files from IIS

Hello there, We have problem of downloading large files through haproxy from IIS share point and MSSQL in the back. User cannot download large files like over 28MB. But user is able to upload large files and download small files. Error in the haproxy.log: Jul 8 11:29:52 localhost haproxy[16087]

Re: haproxy get 502 when downloading large files from IIS

On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 04:47:24PM -0400, Cheng, Xin [USA] wrote: > Hello there, > > We have problem of downloading large files through haproxy from IIS share > point and MSSQL in the back. > User cannot download large files like over 28MB. > But user is able to upload large files and download sm

reroute to different backend on 404 ?

Hi, I'm not quite sure if this is possible with HAproxy, I could do it with nginx, but I'd like to utilize HAproxy's logging to monitor it. We have a "new" document location, and an "old" document location, and we are migrating the documents from the old location to the new.. While we are perfor

Re: Truncated health check response from real servers

> Indeed it never made it in. Each time I look at it, I realize that > cleaning it up and fixing it will take more time than what I have > available to work on it :-/ I can understand that completely. :) Actually, I am not that much interested in the patch per-se, I would just like to check the