Can anyone help-me with it, please? It's look like a bug:
http://discourse.haproxy.org/t/high-cpu-usage-when-exists-close-wait-connections/754
--
Robson Roberto Souza Peixoto
Robinho
Master in Computer Science, University of Campinas
IRC: robsonpeixoto
Twitter: http://twitter.com/robinhopeixoto
Hi there,
using the stick-table (see
http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/1.7/configuration.html#4-stick-table)
it is possible to
gather client-specific statistics, e.g. http_req_rate
Unfortunately in my case these statistics are just a subset of the
aggregated ones provided for the whole proxy
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 04:01:58PM +0200, PR Bot wrote:
> Dear list!
>
> Author: Ian Miell
> Number of patches: 2
>
> This is an automated relay of the Github pull request:
>Minor spelling correction
>
> Patch title(s):
>Very minor spelling correction
>Merge
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:11:23AM +, Gernot Pörner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we are running haproxy 1.5.18 on Ubuntu 14.
>
> Recently we had some issues with misuse of our api by botnets coming from
> many different IPs
> and implemented a mitigation based on haproxys stick-table feature
Hi Jorrit,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:58:54PM +, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Author: Jorrit Schippers
> Number of patches: 1
> Patch titles:
> Fix typo in description of `-st` parameter
>
> Link: https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/pull/65
Patch adjusted and merged. Please in
On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:16:03 +0200
Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
>
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 06:32:29PM +0200, Thierry Fournier wrote:
> > Hi, thank you for the tests. It is exactly the last test. The patches
> > seems to be good.
> >
> > The patches can be merged, if it is
Hi Dirkjan,
sorry for the delay.
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:56:13PM +0200, Dirkjan Bussink wrote:
> I've gone for a somewhat different approach in this patch with a
> compatibility header file. It defines some inline functions from 1.1.0 when
> they are not available. Right now it implements the
2016-10-26 13:26 GMT+05:00 Willy Tarreau :
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 01:15:43PM +0500, ?? wrote:
> > as time goes on ... I see, haproxy moved to github ?
>
> No, it's another fork dedicated to travis that causes some confusion
> and that we're trying to smoothly
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 01:33:24PM +0500, ?? wrote:
> properly tuned travis-ci moves the pressure from maintainer to contributor,
> exactly like you told above :-)
>
> https://travis-ci.org/openresty/lua-nginx-module/pull_requests
>
> PR are being automatically tested (build
as time goes on ... I see, haproxy moved to github ?
I like github, especially for PR and travis.
should I open a PR on those (not very critial) issues ?
and what do you think of travis-ci ? I have some experience in using it,
very nice.
2016-06-07 15:20 GMT+05:00 Willy Tarreau :
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 01:15:43PM +0500, ?? wrote:
> as time goes on ... I see, haproxy moved to github ?
No, it's another fork dedicated to travis that causes some confusion
and that we're trying to smoothly move to fix this recurrent problem.
> I like github, especially
On 22 Oct, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Gabriele,
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 09:40:14PM +0200, Gabriele Cerami wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We're having a problem with version 1.5.14 of haproxy, packaged for
> > CentOS 7, but it seems even the code in master is affected.
> >
> > In situations where
Dear list!
Author: Sasa Tekovic
Number of patches: 1
This is an automated relay of the Github pull request:
Added dist tag to to release field in .spec file
Patch title(s):
Added dist tag to to release field in .spec file
Link:
On 26 Oct, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> to think of it. Are you sure your version doesn't contain certain patches
> affecting the error return path, maybe just some local debugging patches
> that were forgotten ?
I'm only seeing this applied before creating the package
Hello,
Am 26.10.2016 um 15:06 schrieb PR Bot No-Reply:
Dear list!
Author: Erwan Velu
Number of patches: 8
This is an automated relay of the Github pull request:
Cleanup
Patch title(s):
CLEANUP: don't ignore debian/ directory if present
cfgparse: Protect
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:53:08AM +0200, Gabriele Cerami wrote:
> On 22 Oct, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Hi Gabriele,
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 09:40:14PM +0200, Gabriele Cerami wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We're having a problem with version 1.5.14 of haproxy, packaged for
> > > CentOS 7,
Hi,
we are running haproxy 1.5.18 on Ubuntu 14.
Recently we had some issues with misuse of our api by botnets coming from many
different IPs
and implemented a mitigation based on haproxys stick-table feature which works
pretty good for us.
The relevant part of our config looks like this:
Dear list!
Author: Erwan Velu
Number of patches: 8
This is an automated relay of the Github pull request:
Cleanup
Patch title(s):
CLEANUP: don't ignore debian/ directory if present
cfgparse: Protect free on NULL pointer
proto_http: Removing useless variable
Hi all,
Le 25/10/2016 à 23:15, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
Hi,
HAProxy 1.7-dev5 was released on 2016/10/25. It added 65 new commits
after version 1.7-dev4.
[...]
Please find the usual URLs below :
Cyril's HTML doc : http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/
and I've regenerated the documentation
Le 26/10/2016 à 23:31, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
Hi Cyril,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:19:29PM +0200, Cyril Bonté wrote:
Hi all,
Le 25/10/2016 à 23:15, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
Hi,
HAProxy 1.7-dev5 was released on 2016/10/25. It added 65 new commits
after version 1.7-dev4.
[...]
Please find the
Hi Ha proxy Team,
Any updates.
*MyObjective*:Client upload file via HaProxy and it will upload in sftp
servers
*example*:
expected this type of configuration in Ha Proxy
a.kk.com
192.168.0.1(sftp 1 server ip)
b.kk.com
Hi Cyril,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:19:29PM +0200, Cyril Bonté wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Le 25/10/2016 à 23:15, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > HAProxy 1.7-dev5 was released on 2016/10/25. It added 65 new commits
> > after version 1.7-dev4.
> > [...]
> > Please find the usual URLs below :
>
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 03:16:30PM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> > Link:
> > https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/pull/42
>
> This pull-request is from October 2015, I believe at least some of those
> patches have been applied, others may not be relevant anymore; but I didn't
> want to discard
Dear list!
Author: Grant
Number of patches: 1
This is an automated relay of the Github pull request:
Update haproxy.spec URLs to haproxy.org
Patch title(s):
Update haproxy.spec URLs to haproxy.org
Link:
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/pull/23
Edit locally:
Dear list!
Author: Ian Miell
Number of patches: 2
This is an automated relay of the Github pull request:
Minor spelling correction
Patch title(s):
Very minor spelling correction
Merge pull request #1 from ianmiell/ianmiell-patch-1
Link:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 04:33:15PM +, Robson Roberto Souza Peixoto wrote:
> Can anyone help-me with it, please? It's look like a bug:
> http://discourse.haproxy.org/t/high-cpu-usage-when-exists-close-wait-connections/754
You forgot to mention the exact version (haproxy -vv). What OS is
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 04:02:00PM +0200, PR Bot wrote:
> Dear list!
>
> Author: Grant
> Number of patches: 1
>
> This is an automated relay of the Github pull request:
>Update haproxy.spec URLs to haproxy.org
>
> Patch title(s):
>Update haproxy.spec URLs to
27 matches
Mail list logo