High CPU usage when exists CLOSE_WAIT connections

2016-10-26 Thread Robson Roberto Souza Peixoto
Can anyone help-me with it, please? It's look like a bug: http://discourse.haproxy.org/t/high-cpu-usage-when-exists-close-wait-connections/754 -- Robson Roberto Souza Peixoto Robinho Master in Computer Science, University of Campinas IRC: robsonpeixoto Twitter: http://twitter.com/robinhopeixoto

Extending statistics in the stick-table

2016-10-26 Thread Marcus Schiesser
Hi there, using the stick-table (see http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/1.7/configuration.html#4-stick-table) it is possible to gather client-specific statistics, e.g. http_req_rate Unfortunately in my case these statistics are just a subset of the aggregated ones provided for the whole proxy

Re: [PR] Minor spelling correction

2016-10-26 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 04:01:58PM +0200, PR Bot wrote: > Dear list! > > Author: Ian Miell > Number of patches: 2 > > This is an automated relay of the Github pull request: >Minor spelling correction > > Patch title(s): >Very minor spelling correction >Merge

Re: stick table entries in use

2016-10-26 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi, On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:11:23AM +, Gernot Pörner wrote: > Hi, > > we are running haproxy 1.5.18 on Ubuntu 14. > > Recently we had some issues with misuse of our api by botnets coming from > many different IPs > and implemented a mitigation based on haproxys stick-table feature

Re: Github PR: Fix typo in description of `-st` parameter

2016-10-26 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Jorrit, On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:58:54PM +, Lukas Tribus wrote: > Author: Jorrit Schippers > Number of patches: 1 > Patch titles: > Fix typo in description of `-st` parameter > > Link: https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/pull/65 Patch adjusted and merged. Please in

Re: SSL patches

2016-10-26 Thread Thierry Fournier
On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:16:03 +0200 Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Thierry, > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 06:32:29PM +0200, Thierry Fournier wrote: > > Hi, thank you for the tests. It is exactly the last test. The patches > > seems to be good. > > > > The patches can be merged, if it is

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0 support

2016-10-26 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Dirkjan, sorry for the delay. On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:56:13PM +0200, Dirkjan Bussink wrote: > I've gone for a somewhat different approach in this patch with a > compatibility header file. It defines some inline functions from 1.1.0 when > they are not available. Right now it implements the

Re: clang static analysis of haproxy

2016-10-26 Thread Илья Шипицин
2016-10-26 13:26 GMT+05:00 Willy Tarreau : > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 01:15:43PM +0500, ?? wrote: > > as time goes on ... I see, haproxy moved to github ? > > No, it's another fork dedicated to travis that causes some confusion > and that we're trying to smoothly

Re: clang static analysis of haproxy

2016-10-26 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 01:33:24PM +0500, ?? wrote: > properly tuned travis-ci moves the pressure from maintainer to contributor, > exactly like you told above :-) > > https://travis-ci.org/openresty/lua-nginx-module/pull_requests > > PR are being automatically tested (build

Re: clang static analysis of haproxy

2016-10-26 Thread Илья Шипицин
as time goes on ... I see, haproxy moved to github ? I like github, especially for PR and travis. should I open a PR on those (not very critial) issues ? and what do you think of travis-ci ? I have some experience in using it, very nice. 2016-06-07 15:20 GMT+05:00 Willy Tarreau :

Re: clang static analysis of haproxy

2016-10-26 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 01:15:43PM +0500, ?? wrote: > as time goes on ... I see, haproxy moved to github ? No, it's another fork dedicated to travis that causes some confusion and that we're trying to smoothly move to fix this recurrent problem. > I like github, especially

Re: haproxy-systemd-wrapper exit code problem

2016-10-26 Thread Gabriele Cerami
On 22 Oct, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Gabriele, > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 09:40:14PM +0200, Gabriele Cerami wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We're having a problem with version 1.5.14 of haproxy, packaged for > > CentOS 7, but it seems even the code in master is affected. > > > > In situations where

[PR] Added dist tag to to release field in .spec file

2016-10-26 Thread Lukas Tribus
Dear list! Author: Sasa Tekovic Number of patches: 1 This is an automated relay of the Github pull request: Added dist tag to to release field in .spec file Patch title(s): Added dist tag to to release field in .spec file Link:

Re: haproxy-systemd-wrapper exit code problem

2016-10-26 Thread Gabriele Cerami
On 26 Oct, Willy Tarreau wrote: > to think of it. Are you sure your version doesn't contain certain patches > affecting the error return path, maybe just some local debugging patches > that were forgotten ? I'm only seeing this applied before creating the package

Re: [PR] Cleanup

2016-10-26 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hello, Am 26.10.2016 um 15:06 schrieb PR Bot No-Reply: Dear list! Author: Erwan Velu Number of patches: 8 This is an automated relay of the Github pull request: Cleanup Patch title(s): CLEANUP: don't ignore debian/ directory if present cfgparse: Protect

Re: haproxy-systemd-wrapper exit code problem

2016-10-26 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:53:08AM +0200, Gabriele Cerami wrote: > On 22 Oct, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Hi Gabriele, > > > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 09:40:14PM +0200, Gabriele Cerami wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > We're having a problem with version 1.5.14 of haproxy, packaged for > > > CentOS 7,

stick table entries in use

2016-10-26 Thread Gernot Pörner
Hi, we are running haproxy 1.5.18 on Ubuntu 14. Recently we had some issues with misuse of our api by botnets coming from many different IPs and implemented a mitigation based on haproxys stick-table feature which works pretty good for us. The relevant part of our config looks like this:

[PR] Cleanup

2016-10-26 Thread PR Bot No-Reply
Dear list! Author: Erwan Velu Number of patches: 8 This is an automated relay of the Github pull request: Cleanup Patch title(s): CLEANUP: don't ignore debian/ directory if present cfgparse: Protect free on NULL pointer proto_http: Removing useless variable

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.7-dev5

2016-10-26 Thread Cyril Bonté
Hi all, Le 25/10/2016 à 23:15, Willy Tarreau a écrit : Hi, HAProxy 1.7-dev5 was released on 2016/10/25. It added 65 new commits after version 1.7-dev4. [...] Please find the usual URLs below : Cyril's HTML doc : http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/ and I've regenerated the documentation

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.7-dev5

2016-10-26 Thread Cyril Bonté
Le 26/10/2016 à 23:31, Willy Tarreau a écrit : Hi Cyril, On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:19:29PM +0200, Cyril Bonté wrote: Hi all, Le 25/10/2016 à 23:15, Willy Tarreau a écrit : Hi, HAProxy 1.7-dev5 was released on 2016/10/25. It added 65 new commits after version 1.7-dev4. [...] Please find the

Re: S FTP + HA PROXY confutation facing one serious issue.

2016-10-26 Thread mal reddy
Hi Ha proxy Team, Any updates. *MyObjective*:Client upload file via HaProxy and it will upload in sftp servers *example*: expected this type of configuration in Ha Proxy a.kk.com 192.168.0.1(sftp 1 server ip) b.kk.com

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.7-dev5

2016-10-26 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Cyril, On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:19:29PM +0200, Cyril Bonté wrote: > Hi all, > > Le 25/10/2016 à 23:15, Willy Tarreau a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > HAProxy 1.7-dev5 was released on 2016/10/25. It added 65 new commits > > after version 1.7-dev4. > > [...] > > Please find the usual URLs below : >

Re: [PR] Cleanup

2016-10-26 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 03:16:30PM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote: > > Link: > > https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/pull/42 > > This pull-request is from October 2015, I believe at least some of those > patches have been applied, others may not be relevant anymore; but I didn't > want to discard

[PR] Update haproxy.spec URLs to haproxy.org

2016-10-26 Thread PR Bot
Dear list! Author: Grant Number of patches: 1 This is an automated relay of the Github pull request: Update haproxy.spec URLs to haproxy.org Patch title(s): Update haproxy.spec URLs to haproxy.org Link: https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/pull/23 Edit locally:

[PR] Minor spelling correction

2016-10-26 Thread PR Bot
Dear list! Author: Ian Miell Number of patches: 2 This is an automated relay of the Github pull request: Minor spelling correction Patch title(s): Very minor spelling correction Merge pull request #1 from ianmiell/ianmiell-patch-1 Link:

Re: High CPU usage when exists CLOSE_WAIT connections

2016-10-26 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi, On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 04:33:15PM +, Robson Roberto Souza Peixoto wrote: > Can anyone help-me with it, please? It's look like a bug: > http://discourse.haproxy.org/t/high-cpu-usage-when-exists-close-wait-connections/754 You forgot to mention the exact version (haproxy -vv). What OS is

Re: [PR] Update haproxy.spec URLs to haproxy.org

2016-10-26 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 04:02:00PM +0200, PR Bot wrote: > Dear list! > > Author: Grant > Number of patches: 1 > > This is an automated relay of the Github pull request: >Update haproxy.spec URLs to haproxy.org > > Patch title(s): >Update haproxy.spec URLs to