From: Frédéric Lécaille
Hi ML, Willy,
Here is a new series of patches for this feature with Willy's remarks
taken into an account. Was easy to break something ;) but I think
this series does not break the current usage of "peers" section.
I prefered work from the previous series without
From: Frédéric Lécaille
Avoid useless code indentation.
May be backported to 1.5 and newer.
---
src/cfgparse.c | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/cfgparse.c b/src/cfgparse.c
index 6fde7c9f..6670a861 100644
--- a/src/cfgparse.c
+++ b/src/cfgparse.c
@@
From: Frédéric Lécaille
Make "bind" line also parse the local peer bind address.
Add "default-bind" option to parse the binding options excepted the bind
address.
Prevent "bind" lines to be mixed with "peer" line to help in handling the
migration.
---
src/cfgparse.c | 153
From: Frédéric Lécaille
This patch makes "bind" work in "peers" sections. All "bind" settings
are supported, excepted ip:port parameters which are provided on
"peer" (or server) line matching the local peer.
After having parsed the configuration files ->prepare_bind_conf is run
to initialize all
From: Frédéric Lécaille
Even if not already the case, we suppose that the frontend "peers" section
may have been already initialized outside of "peer" line, we seperate
their initializations from their binding initializations.
May be backported to 1.5 and newer.
---
src/cfgparse.c | 50
From: Frédéric Lécaille
---
doc/configuration.txt | 40 +++-
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/doc/configuration.txt b/doc/configuration.txt
index 888515fb..960f1948 100644
--- a/doc/configuration.txt
+++ b/doc/configuration.txt
@@
From: Frédéric Lécaille
May help the series of patches to be reviewed.
May be backported to 1.5 and newer.
---
src/cfgparse.c | 72 +-
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/cfgparse.c b/src/cfgparse.c
index
From: Frédéric Lécaille
Make init_peers_frontend() be callable without having to check if
there is something to do or not.
May be backported to 1.5 and newer.
---
src/cfgparse.c | 7 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/cfgparse.c b/src/cfgparse.c
index
From: Frédéric Lécaille
Use ->local "peers" struct member to flag a "peers" section frontend
has being initialized. This is to be able to initialize the frontend
of "peers" sections on lines different from "peer" lines.
May be backported to 1.5 and newer.
---
src/cfgparse.c | 17
From: Frédéric Lécaille
With this patch the "server" lines do not parse anymore the bind address
for local peers.
We do not use anymore list_for_each_entry() to set the "peers" section
listeners parameter because there is only one listener by "peers" section.
---
include/proto/server.h | 2 +-
From: Frédéric Lécaille
This patch adds pointer to a struct server to peer structure which
is initialized after having parsed a remote "peer" line.
After having parsed all peers section we run ->prepare_srv to initialize
all SSL/TLS stuff of remote perr (or server).
Remaining thing to do to
From: Frédéric Lécaille
Create init_peers_frontend() function to allocate and initialize
the frontend of "peers" sections (->peers_fe) so that to reuse it later.
May be backported to 1.5 and newer.
---
src/cfgparse.c | 34 ++
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 8
From: Frédéric Lécaille
With this patch "default-server" lines are supported in "peers" sections
to setup the default settings of peers which are from now setup
when parsing both "peer" and "server" lines.
May be backported to 1.5 and newer.
---
src/cfgparse.c | 88
Le 15/01/2019 à 21:07, PiBa-NL a écrit :
Hi Christopher,
Op 15-1-2019 om 10:48 schreef Christopher Faulet:
Le 14/01/2019 à 21:53, PiBa-NL a écrit :
Hi Christopher,
Op 14-1-2019 om 11:17 schreef Christopher Faulet:
Le 12/01/2019 à 23:23, PiBa-NL a écrit :
Hi List,
I've configured haproxy
Hi Willy,
It appears that 51.d still uses some elements of the the now deprecated buffer
API, so I have attached a patch which updates the usage to the new buffer API.
This can also be backported to 1.9 where the new API was introduced.
Thanks,
Ben Shillito
Developer
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 02:28:56PM +0100, Christopher Faulet wrote:
> Rah ! I'll probably need some rest. I've done my tests without the HTX
> enabled... It's a bit embarrassing and not really responsible.
Let's say it's due to uncaught -EKIDSAROUND :-)
> Anyway, here is a new patch, again.
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:32:00AM +0300, Wert wrote:
> How to reproduce:
> 1. Start browser-download (content-disposition: attachment) of some big file
> through H2
> * Tested with 1Gb file and several Chrome-versions (67-)
> 2. Make reload
> 3. Process with this connection would stay,
Hi Willy,
Great, thanks for the quick turnaround.
Regards,
Ben Shillito
Developer
O: +44 1183 287152
E: b...@51degrees.com
T: @51Degrees
-Original Message-
From: Willy Tarreau [mailto:w...@1wt.eu]
Sent: 16 January 2019 16:27
To: Ben Shillito
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re:
Hi Willy,
Thanks for the workaround and explanation. Works as expected.
Sincerely,
Amin Shayan
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 6:15 PM Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Amin,
>
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 05:23:17PM +0100, Amin Shayan wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I'm trying to get clients request http version
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 11:24:58AM +0300, Wert wrote:
> Problem:
> Sometimes in multi-process configuration might appear error "Failed to get
> the number of sockets to be transferred !" during reload.
> Than new instance would silently fail like 50-80% of new connections.
>
>
> Reason:
>
Hi,
HAProxy 1.9.2 was released on 2019/01/16. It added 58 new commits
after version 1.9.1.
It addresses a number of lower importance pending issues that were not
yet merged into 1.9.1, one bug in the cache and fixes some long-standing
limitations that were affecting H2.
The highest severity
Hi.
Am 16.01.2019 um 16:35 schrieb mirko stefanelli:
> Hi to all,
>
> we are trying to move from Apache reverse proxy to Haproxy, you can see below
> a
> part of del file Apache httpd.conf:
>
>
> ServerName dipendenti.xxx.xxx.it
> ErrorLog logs/intranet_ssl_error_log
> TransferLog
Hi to all,
we are trying to move from Apache reverse proxy to Haproxy, you can see
below a part of del file Apache httpd.conf:
ServerName dipendenti.xxx.xxx.it
ErrorLog logs/intranet_ssl_error_log
TransferLog logs/intranet_ssl_access_log
LogLevel info
ProxyRequests Off
Hi Ben,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 11:43:03AM +, Ben Shillito wrote:
> Hi Willy,
>
> It appears that 51.d still uses some elements of the the now deprecated
> buffer API, so I have attached a patch which updates the usage to the new
> buffer API.
>
> This can also be backported to 1.9 where
Hi Amin,
On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 05:23:17PM +0100, Amin Shayan wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm trying to get clients request http version and it seems %HV which is
> the last field of %r works fine for http/0.9,1.0,1.1. However I get
> http/1.1 on logs for http2 requests.
>
> Using HAProxy 1.8.16, Is
Hi Pieter,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 08:44:58PM +0100, PiBa-NL wrote:
> Hi Willy, Christopher,
> Op 16-1-2019 om 17:32 schreef Willy Tarreau:
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 02:28:56PM +0100, Christopher Faulet wrote:
> > > here is a new patch, again. Willy, I hope it will be good for the
> > > release
Hi.
Am 16.01.2019 um 19:02 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi,
>
> HAProxy 1.9.2 was released on 2019/01/16. It added 58 new commits
> after version 1.9.1.
>
> It addresses a number of lower importance pending issues that were not
> yet merged into 1.9.1, one bug in the cache and fixes some
Hi Willy, Christopher,
Op 16-1-2019 om 17:32 schreef Willy Tarreau:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 02:28:56PM +0100, Christopher Faulet wrote:
here is a new patch, again. Willy, I hope it will be good for the
release 1.9.2.
This one works :).
OK so I've mergd it now, thank you!
Willy
Op 14-1-2019
Hi Aleks,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 11:52:12PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> For service routing are the standard haproxy content routing options possible
> (path, header, ...) , right?
Yes absolutely.
> If someone want to route based on grpc content he can use lua with body
> content
>
> CC'ing Thierry: as this has come on this discourse, can we have your
> opinion about the FD's in LUA and howto best handle ulimit?
> Apologies for the duplicate mail.
> Thanks,
> Lukas
1. FD
I don't know your architecture too much. From user-side I just see no reasons
to keep FD that
Problem:
Sometimes in multi-process configuration might appear error "Failed to get the
number of sockets to be transferred !" during reload.
Than new instance would silently fail like 50-80% of new connections.
Reason:
There is hard-coded timeout in get_old_sockets() - 1 second.
It is used for
Hi.
Am 16.01.2019 um 06:43 schrieb Vũ Xuân Học:
> Dear,
>
> I fixed it. I use { src x.x.x.x ... } in use_backend and it worked.
>
> Many thanks,
Great ;-).
How about the origin issue with the ssl, how is the solution now?
Best regards
Aleks
> -Original Message-
> From: Vũ Xuân Học
32 matches
Mail list logo