Tim,
On 9/12/20 4:25 PM, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Reinhard,
>
> Am 12.09.20 um 12:45 schrieb Reinhard Vicinus:
>> thanks, for your reply and the information. Sorry for my late reply, but
>> I had only today time to test. I did try to get the spoa server working
>> on a ubuntu bionic (18.04.4) with
Tim,
Aleksandar,
On 9/8/20 11:18 PM, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> On 08.09.20 22:54, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
>> Reinhard,
>> Björn,
>>
>> Am 08.09.20 um 21:39 schrieb Björn Jacke:
the only official supported way to identify a google bot is to run a
reverse DNS lookup on the accessing IP
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 11:31:29AM +0500, ??? wrote:
> so, it is good time to adjust .gitignore :)
>
> I also added commit message with explanation. I'm ok if you modify it by
> your will.
That's perfect, all applied with no change now, thank you very much Ilya!
Willy
Reinhard,
Am 12.09.20 um 16:43 schrieb Reinhard Vicinus:
>>> thanks, for your reply and the information. Sorry for my late reply, but
>>> I had only today time to test. I did try to get the spoa server working
>>> on a ubuntu bionic (18.04.4) with haproxy 2.2.3-2ppa1~bionic from the
>>> vbernat
Reinhard,
Am 12.09.20 um 12:45 schrieb Reinhard Vicinus:
> thanks, for your reply and the information. Sorry for my late reply, but
> I had only today time to test. I did try to get the spoa server working
> on a ubuntu bionic (18.04.4) with haproxy 2.2.3-2ppa1~bionic from the
> vbernat ppa. I
so, it is good time to adjust .gitignore :)
I also added commit message with explanation. I'm ok if you modify it by
your will.
чт, 10 сент. 2020 г. в 22:34, Willy Tarreau :
> Hi Ilya,
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 09:45:08PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > ping :)
>
> Ah sorry, thanks for the
Hi old friends!,
Is in the roadmap the addition of a circuit breaking which adapts its settings
using real-time data?
I believe we discussed this in the last HAProxyConf with a group of people, but
I don't remember if there were
, back then, concrete plans to work on it.
I know that something
This fixes at least one instance where the wrong type was given to sizeof.
clang-analyzer complained that in src/cfgparse.c line 3614
(newsrv->curr_idle_thr):
> Result of 'calloc' is converted to a pointer of type 'unsigned int', which is
> incompatible with sizeof operand type 'int'
Changes
Hi Tim,
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 05:32:03PM +0200, Tim Duesterhus wrote:
> This fixes at least one instance where the wrong type was given to sizeof.
> clang-analyzer complained that in src/cfgparse.c line 3614
> (newsrv->curr_idle_thr):
>
> > Result of 'calloc' is converted to a pointer of type
Changes performed using the following coccinelle patch:
@@
type T;
expression E;
expression t;
@@
(
t = calloc(E, sizeof(*t))
|
- t = calloc(E, sizeof(T))
+ t = calloc(E, sizeof(*t))
)
Looking through the commit history, grepping for coccinelle
Willy,
Am 12.09.20 um 18:52 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Thanks for doing this, I really appreciate it as I too hate having
> a named type in calloc, as it doesn't survive code changes over time.
>
> I'd rather have one patch to fix the known bug and the rest as a
> cleanup patch however, so that we
newsrv->curr_idle_thr is of type `unsigned int`, not `int`. Fix this issue
by simply passing the dereferenced pointer to sizeof, which is the preferred
style anyway.
This bug was introduced in commit dc2f2753e97ecfe94827de56ee9efd2cd6d39ad3.
It first appeared in 2.2-dev5. The patch must be
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 08:26:41PM +0200, Tim Duesterhus wrote:
> Willy,
>
> Am 12.09.20 um 18:52 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> > Thanks for doing this, I really appreciate it as I too hate having
> > a named type in calloc, as it doesn't survive code changes over time.
> >
> > I'd rather have one
13 matches
Mail list logo
