On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 09:04:51AM +0500, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is straightforward patch, which is supposed to be backported to all
> versions.
> master also requires another small patch, will be sent later.
>
> cheers,
> Ilya
> From 8cec1c658607a1370bd87682717f5f6512f242d6 Mon Sep
Willy,
Am 18.10.20 um 17:09 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
>> [1] I did not get around fixing the "hiding headers or body at the end
>> of the version string is deprecated" one yet.
>
> I guess this is the one about the health checks ? If so I'm assuming it's
> essentially because you're taking care of
пн, 19 окт. 2020 г. в 13:18, William Lallemand :
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 09:04:51AM +0500, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this is straightforward patch, which is supposed to be backported to all
> > versions.
> > master also requires another small patch, will be sent later.
> >
> > cheers,
пн, 19 окт. 2020 г. в 16:17, William Lallemand :
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 12:19:09AM +0500, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> > while BoringSSL claims to be 1.1.1 compatible, it still misses few
> > functions.
> > let us add guards (there'll be more in next few days)
> >
> > cheers,
> > Ilya
>
> > From
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 12:19:09AM +0500, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> while BoringSSL claims to be 1.1.1 compatible, it still misses few
> functions.
> let us add guards (there'll be more in next few days)
>
> cheers,
> Ilya
> From da98de10e55183319f773032f1518121227396b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>
Le 16/10/2020 à 10:04, Christopher Faulet a écrit :
Le 13/10/2020 à 14:53, Peter Statham a écrit :
Hello,
We've found an issue when using agent checks in conjunction with the weighted
least connections algorithm in multithreaded mode. It seems to me as if it is
possible for next_eweight in
I've just tested, this patch is required for 2.1 as well (it was applied
today for 2.2 and master)
вс, 18 окт. 2020 г. в 09:14, Илья Шипицин :
> this is only for master
>
> вс, 18 окт. 2020 г. в 09:04, Илья Шипицин :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is straightforward patch, which is supposed to be
Hello,
I'm new to this list and somewhat new to HAProxy. Before posting I
scanned the archives and found a thread from 2015 that seems to apply to
my situation:
IP binding and standby health-checks
https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg18728.html
The specifics of our
8 matches
Mail list logo