On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 11:23:32PM +0500, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> hopefully final BoringSSL patches this week.
>
> Ilya
Thanks, all merged!
--
William Lallemand
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:42:53AM +0100, Lothruin Mirwen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've seen on proxy protocol spec (
> https://www.haproxy.org/download/2.3/doc/proxy-protocol.txt) the section
> "Validation" with a list of tested implementations for some protocols.
>
> Right now on SubEthaSMTP we
Maciej,
Am 23.11.20 um 22:44 schrieb Maciej Zdeb:
> There's a crash report on github:
> https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/909#issuecomment-732241492 with a
> reproducer and also stack trace from Willy. That list init is necessary
> because release_http_action() is trying to iterate over
út 24. 11. 2020 v 12:28 odesílatel Aleksandar Lazic
napsal:
> I have downloaded the zip and see that you use the "contrib/spoa_server"
> which have some issues which have Christopher Faulet explained in this post
> https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg38484.html
>
> As far as I
Hello Joao,
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 12:33:38PM -0300, Joao Morais wrote:
>
> It’s indeed rather confusing, sorry about the mess.
>
> Here is a new proposal of the last paragraph, how it sounds? - suggestions
> welcome, note that I’m not very familiar with english
>
>
>
> The first
wt., 24 lis 2020 o 10:34 Willy Tarreau napisał(a):
> I prefer the former. If there's a list head, it must be valid. We must
> not start to look at list pointers to guess whether or not they are
> properly initialized, there are enough exceptions and special cases
> everywhere in the code not to
Hi guys,
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:52:24AM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> > Now I had more time to look at the code and maybe a cleaner solution is to
> > add an additional check to release_http_action() instead of initializing
> > the list (patch attached).
>
> From my point of view: I like
> Em 24 de nov de 2020, à(s) 05:47, William Lallemand
> escreveu:
>
> Hello Joao,
>
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 12:33:38PM -0300, Joao Morais wrote:
>>
>> It’s indeed rather confusing, sorry about the mess.
>>
>> Here is a new proposal of the last paragraph, how it sounds? - suggestions
>>
Hi!
I've seen on proxy protocol spec (
https://www.haproxy.org/download/2.3/doc/proxy-protocol.txt) the section
"Validation" with a list of tested implementations for some protocols.
Right now on SubEthaSMTP we have created a new release with support for
proxy protocol
Hi all,
this week-end I had to roll back haproxy.org on 2.3 from 2.4-dev1 after
William Dauchy informed me that git clone was crawling very slowly. The
problem appeared with recent fix "BUG/MEDIUM: filters: Forward all
filtered data at the end of http filtering" that was already backported
as far
Hello,
I'm trying to implement content inspection using haproxy/SPOE and SPOA
agent.
I created basic sample configuration to demonstrate my issue:
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/956#issuecomment-732806414
To reproduce locally, just download contentdebug.zip archive from link
above,
Hi.
On 24.11.20 11:48, Stanislav Pavlíček wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to implement content inspection using haproxy/SPOE and SPOA agent.
I created basic sample configuration to demonstrate my issue:
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/956#issuecomment-732806414
To reproduce locally,
Le 24/11/2020 à 10:27, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
Hi all,
this week-end I had to roll back haproxy.org on 2.3 from 2.4-dev1 after
William Dauchy informed me that git clone was crawling very slowly. The
problem appeared with recent fix "BUG/MEDIUM: filters: Forward all
filtered data at the end of
út 24. 11. 2020 v 14:29 odesílatel Stanislav Pavlíček <
stanislav.pavli...@gmail.com> napsal:
> tcp rulesets are only evaluated once. But, you may wait to eval a rule
> using an
>
>> ACL. For instance "if { req.len gt 0 }".
>>
>
I tried to follow your example and with acl and req.body as argument
Le 24/11/2020 à 11:48, Stanislav Pavlíček a écrit :
Hello,
I'm trying to implement content inspection using haproxy/SPOE and SPOA agent.
I created basic sample configuration to demonstrate my issue:
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/956#issuecomment-732806414
út 24. 11. 2020 v 13:57 odesílatel Christopher Faulet
napsal:
> > The issue is that although I declared tcp-request/tcp-reponse content
> > send-spoa-group rules, my SPOA agent is called only once with request
> length 0
> > and no payload.
> >
>
> tcp rulesets are only evaluated once. But, you
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 03:22:53PM +0100, Christopher Faulet wrote:
> The fix has been merged and backported as far as 2.0. The commit in the
> 2.4-dev is 401e6dbff ("BUG/MAJOR: filters: Always keep all offsets up to
> date during data filtering").
Thanks for the quick fix, Christopher. And I can
NFP WORKSHOPS
18 Blake Street, York YO1 8QG 01133 280988
Affordable Training Courses for Charities, Schools & Public Sector
Organisations
This email has been sent to haproxy@formilux.org
CLICK TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM LIST
Alternatively send a blank e-mail to unsubscr...@nfpmail2001.co.uk
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 08:59:05AM -0300, Joao Morais wrote:
>
>
> > Em 24 de nov de 2020, à(s) 05:47, William Lallemand
> > escreveu:
> >
> > Hello Joao,
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 12:33:38PM -0300, Joao Morais wrote:
> >>
> >> It’s indeed rather confusing, sorry about the mess.
> >>
19 matches
Mail list logo
