On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 03:15:27AM +0500, ??? wrote:
> Hello,
>
> another fine guard.
Look good, now applied, thank you Ilya!
Willy
Hi Ilya,
please could you provide a commit message for this one which is totally
cryptic to me:
> From c0811d0580d7ff5f5650e17afbc5ecf9d173f772 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ilya Shipitsin
> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 01:03:12 +0500
> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] CI: codespell: whitelist "te" and "nd"
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 03:49:08PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> te is widely used abbrevation for "transfer encoding"
> nd is variable name "name description"
>
> we need to teach codespell those are legitimate
Perfect, makes sense, now applied. Thank you.
Willy
Hi,
HAProxy 2.4-dev4 was released on 2020/12/21. It added 33 new commits
after version 2.4-dev3.
In this traditionally calm period, there aren't that many changes, except
a lot of bug fixes. Actually 3 bugs in dev3 managed to cause crashes on
haproxy.org, this hadn't happened in a very long
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 12:20:36PM +0100, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> > 2) we include from this file so that it becomes
> > consistent
> > with everything else ;
> >
> > 3) we add the ifdef VAR_ARRAY directly into the file so that it
> > continues
> > not to depend on anything and
Hi David,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 03:54:34PM +, David CARLIER wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I started to look at Haproxy on ARM and stumbled across the
> implementation of cpu relax. While it is needed to have such
> instruction, I am however wondering if the yield instruction is not
> more appropriate
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 11:23:02PM +0100, PR Bot wrote:
> Dear list!
>
> Author: Jan Wagner
> Number of patches: 1
>
> This is an automated relay of the Github pull request:
>smp_size and sample_size seems to be mixed in docu
>
> Patch title(s):
>smp_size and sample_size seems to be
Hi Willy,
Thank you for your answer.
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 11:08 AM Willy Tarreau wrote:
> What impact do you think this renaming can have on stable versions ?
> I suspect the reason it was not backported was to avoid breakage. But
> actually maybe the difference between older and newer
Hi William,
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 11:55:18AM +0100, William Dauchy wrote:
> commit c55a626217a7e676e1cc ("MINOR: contrib/prometheus-exporter: Add
> missing global and per-server metrics") is renaming two metrics:
> server_idle_connections_current
> server_idle_connections_limit
>
> This
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 12:58:52PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> ping :)
Oh I completely missed this one in the noise it seems! I'm sorry.
> > Author: Christian Ruppert
> > Number of patches: 1
> >
> > This is an automated relay of the Github pull request:
> >hpack-tbl-t.h uses
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 01:05:50PM +0100, William Dauchy wrote:
> > I'm not opposed at all to merging your patch, I'm just worried that
> > some users will then report that these metrics are missing. Or should
> > we duplicate them so that they appear with the two names in older
> > versions maybe
Ilya,
Am 21.12.20 um 13:41 schrieb Илья Шипицин:
> this will hopefully prevent regressions on halog.
>
I disagree with putting these into the VTest workflow. They do not
depend on VTest and they do not depend on the build flags.
Can you create a dedicated YML file for these, similar to the
Willy,
Am 21.12.20 um 12:22 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Just my two cents, I'm interested in anyone's opinion or suggestion here.
Your proposal sounds good to me.
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
Willy,
Am 21.12.20 um 12:22 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> HAProxy 2.4-dev4 was released on 2020/12/21. It added 33 new commits
> after version 2.4-dev3.
>
> In this traditionally calm period, there aren't that many changes, except
> a lot of bug fixes. Actually 3 bugs in dev3 managed to cause crashes
Willy,
please fill in the severity yourself, because I don't know what effects this
bug causes.
Check the issue for details:
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/1015
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
Apply with `git am --scissors` to automatically cut the commit message.
-- >8 --
This is a
Hi Tim,
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 07:08:45PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Looking at haproxy.org I am seeing that the end of life for HAProxy 1.6
> is Q4-2020. Q4 is almost over. Is this on your radar? It probably makes
> sense to:
>
> - do a final 1.6 release, and
> - at the same time move 1.8
пн, 21 дек. 2020 г. в 22:59, Tim Düsterhus :
> Ilya,
>
> Am 21.12.20 um 13:41 schrieb Илья Шипицин:
> > this will hopefully prevent regressions on halog.
> >
>
> I disagree with putting these into the VTest workflow. They do not
> depend on VTest and they do not depend on the build flags.
>
> Can
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 09:53:38AM +0100, Baptiste wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since 2.2, HAProxy runtime resolver uses the Additional records of an SRV
> response when available. That said, there was a small bug when multiple
> records points to the same hostname and IP, then the subsequent ones may
>
пн, 21 дек. 2020 г. в 15:27, Willy Tarreau :
> Hi Ilya,
>
> please could you provide a commit message for this one which is totally
> cryptic to me:
>
> > From c0811d0580d7ff5f5650e17afbc5ecf9d173f772 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Ilya Shipitsin
> > Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 01:03:12 +0500
> >
Hey Willy,
On 2020-12-21 11:36, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 12:58:52PM +0500, ??? wrote:
ping :)
Oh I completely missed this one in the noise it seems! I'm sorry.
No problem! :)
> Author: Christian Ruppert
> Number of patches: 1
>
> This is an automated
Hello,
this will hopefully prevent regressions on halog.
Ilya
From 57696674aef9431a01db6405cdba8b164162e2b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ilya Shipitsin
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 17:35:37 +0500
Subject: [PATCH] CI: github actions: build several popular "contrib" tools
this adds "halog", "flags"
NFP WORKSHOPS
18 Blake Street, York YO1 8QG 01133 280988
Affordable Training Courses for Charities, Schools & Public Sector
Organisations
This email has been sent to haproxy@formilux.org
CLICK TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM LIST
Alternatively send a blank e-mail to unsubscr...@nfpmail2001.co.uk
22 matches
Mail list logo
