Karl,
Take a look at...http://code.google.com/p/haproxy-docs/wiki/forwardforYou can also use reqadd which I've done to add ports and protocols like so (thought I'm not sure how you'd get the client ip)â¦reqadd X-Forwarded-Protocol:\ httpreqadd
Hey Carl,
Is your device sending a http request header. Maybe you can snag the
referrer.
--
Chris LeBlanc
If you see this rotate your iPhone 90°
On Jun 4, 2012, at 7:38 PM, Karl Kloppenborg k...@crucialp.com wrote:
Hey Chris,
Yep I’ve been doing that for a while to make my SSL termination
hardcoded in the https frontend (and http
frontend for consistency).
Hope that helps. I know newer versions of haproxy and stunnel are required so
double check that.
--
Chris LeBlanc
On Tuesday, June 5, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Baptiste wrote:
well, not adding a header, but getting connected
?
--
Chris LeBlanc
If you see this rotate your iPhone 90°
:42:46.380] http sld-web-3/sld-web-3 43/0/2/1126/1171 200 3540 -
- 9/9/1/1/0 0/0 GET / HTTP/1.1
--
Chris LeBlanc
On Wednesday, June 6, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Chris,
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 09:54:17PM -0500, Chris LeBlanc wrote:
Hey all,
Is anyone aware
mechanism to prevent
wacko things from happening to your data).
For now I copied what was in .landfill locally on one of the nodes so it's just
limping along.
What should I do? Should I be concern about the data integrity of what's in
.landslide?
--
Chris LeBlanc
and also how I can prevent this
in the future. I admit I didn't have the brick mount in the fstab but even so
can we rely on the order the mount points are written in fstab?.
--
Chris LeBlanc
On Friday, June 8, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Chris LeBlanc wrote:
I have a replicated gluster using nfs and one
Am I the only one who read bread sticks on this subject. I must be hungry. :)
On Jun 16, 2012, at 4:22 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
Hi Igor,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 05:13:31PM +0800, Igor wrote:
Hi,
The configuration below works fine in dev8, but in
haproxy-ss-20120607, it
Hi friends,
I have been using the Mojocode repository found here
(https://launchpad.net/~mojocode/+archive/ppa/+build/2947499) to install
haproxy 1.5dev7.
I am now trying to upgrade to Ubuntu Precise and was wondering what's the best
way to install haproxy with send-proxy support for
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Chris LeBlanc ch...@blendedby.us wrote:
Hi friends,
I have been using the Mojocode repository found here
(https://launchpad.net/~mojocode/+archive/ppa/+build/2947499) to install
haproxy 1.5dev7.
I am now trying to upgrade to Ubuntu Precise and was wondering
Hi friends,
I'm trying to allow nginx to delegate https properly and one way I see to
prevent from having to write a bunch of backends in haproxy is to omit the port
number when using the server directive as follows:
frontend https
bind :81 accept-proxy
maxconn 1
:08 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
Hi Chris,
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:57:48AM -0500, Chris LeBlanc wrote:
Hi friends,
I'm trying to allow nginx to delegate https properly and one way I see to
prevent from having to write a bunch of backends in haproxy is to omit the
port number when
Assuming your ssl terminator (in this case I presume it's nginx) is on the same
box as haproxy, haproxy basically is getting unencrypted content.
I've not used nginx to do ssl termination but stunnel supports the proxy
protocol and passes all of the once encrypted cookie information to haproxy
on the same box, but the backends dont. They
are on a totally different network
and some people argue that traffic crosses some routers unencrypted.
So to be more clear: haproxy gets unencrypted traffic and should
encrypt it again.
Greetings
Stefan
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Chris
I concur,
We don't worry about encrypting traffic that is sent from haproxy to the
backends.
On Monday, July 16, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Gabriel Sosa wrote:
IMHO
if you run your servers in a trusted network, **haproxy == stunnel
== server** part adds a lot of overhead
we do
client ==
15 matches
Mail list logo
