On 2023-01-23 07:58:24, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Marc,
Hi Willy,
Thanks for your reply and all of your work on haproxy!
> I think you should try to flood the machine using UDP traffic to see
> the difference between the part that happens in the network stack and
> the part that happens in the
Hi,
We have been running HAProxy on OpenBSD for serveral years (currently
OpenBSD 7.2 / HAProxy 2.6.7) and everything has been working perfect
until a recent event of higher than normal traffic. It was an unexpected
flood to one site and above ~1100 cur sessions we started to see major
impacts to
On 2023-01-24 06:58:57, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Marc,
Hi Willy,
> See the difference ? There seems to be an insane FD locking cost on this
> system that simply wastes 40% of the CPU there. So I suspect that in your
> first tests you were stressing the locking while in the last ones you
> were
On 2023-01-24 23:04:14, Olivier Houchard wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 11:05:37PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 02:15:08PM -0600, Marc West wrote:
> > > > Stupid question but I prefer to ask in order to be certain, are all of
> > &
Hi Stefan and thanks for your replies.
(Sorry for the late reply and replying to my own mail, I don't seem to
be receiving messages from the list after confirming the subscription
twice and noticed your replies when checking the archives.)
> when I understand you correct then you have
On 2023-03-07 08:09:04, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> I admit I only toyed with TP, so I really don???t know what I???m doing
> there, but:
>
> Have you tried to just use pfSense for this? The developer of the package
> (https://github.com/PiBa-NL) seemed to be active here, but I haven???t seen
>
Hi,
I saw in the 2.6.10 release notes to report any issues that seem like
they could be related to the concurrency changes. When reloading config
on 2.6.10 or 2.6.11 on FreeBSD 13.1-RELEASE the old process does not
exit and starts to use 100%+ CPU. This does not happen on 2.6.9 with
the same
On 2023-03-26 07:19:18, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> I could finally reproduce it, figure the cause and the fix. The 2.6
> backport is missing this patch for evports and kqueue:
>
> 698342635 BUG/MAJOR: poller: drop FD's tgid when masks don't match
>
> I could verify that it fixes the problem.
Hi,
After my other thread about performance issues on OpenBSD we decided to
switch OSes on our HAProxy boxes to FreeBSD 13.1. In the test
environment everything worked perfectly with transparent proxying but
when cutting production over to FreeBSD I ran into an issue and had to
revert for now.
9 matches
Mail list logo
