Re: Haproxy first core 100%

2017-05-29 Thread Haim Ari
lization. I returned the configuration to run on a single core (#1) and will update in case the issue returns Thanks From: Lukas Tribus <lu...@gmx.net> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 7:33 PM To: Haim Ari; haproxy@formilux.org Subject: Re: Haproxy first core

Re: Haproxy first core 100%

2017-05-25 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hello Haim, Am 25.05.2017 um 09:23 schrieb Haim Ari: > > Hello, > > > I'll try do describe the issue as clear as possible: > > > We set up an haproxy Cluster on Ubuntu16.04 + pacemaker + corosync > > We faced an issue where after working for a few hours with single core > (the haproxy process

Re: Haproxy first core 100%

2017-05-25 Thread Haim Ari
1110052 total Thanks From: Haim Ari Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 10:23:18 AM To: haproxy@formilux.org Subject: Haproxy first core 100% Hello, I'll try do describe the issue as clear as possible: We set up an haproxy Cluster on Ubuntu16.04

Haproxy first core 100%

2017-05-25 Thread Haim Ari
Hello, I'll try do describe the issue as clear as possible: We set up an haproxy Cluster on Ubuntu16.04 + pacemaker + corosync We faced an issue where after working for a few hours with single core (the haproxy process was bind to core #1 not #0 - which is handling the IRQ interrupts ) it