lization.
I returned the configuration to run on a single core (#1) and will update in
case the issue returns
Thanks
From: Lukas Tribus <lu...@gmx.net>
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 7:33 PM
To: Haim Ari; haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: Haproxy first core
Hello Haim,
Am 25.05.2017 um 09:23 schrieb Haim Ari:
>
> Hello,
>
>
> I'll try do describe the issue as clear as possible:
>
>
> We set up an haproxy Cluster on Ubuntu16.04 + pacemaker + corosync
>
> We faced an issue where after working for a few hours with single core
> (the haproxy process
1110052 total
Thanks
From: Haim Ari
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 10:23:18 AM
To: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Haproxy first core 100%
Hello,
I'll try do describe the issue as clear as possible:
We set up an haproxy Cluster on Ubuntu16.04
Hello,
I'll try do describe the issue as clear as possible:
We set up an haproxy Cluster on Ubuntu16.04 + pacemaker + corosync
We faced an issue where after working for a few hours with single core (the
haproxy process was bind to core #1 not #0 - which is handling the IRQ
interrupts )
it
4 matches
Mail list logo