Willy,
Am 14.03.20 um 12:15 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Good point we could indeed. Quite frankly it's a detail since this
> really is developer-only code. Nobody wants to run with DEBUG_UAF by
> accident, it's slow and uses a lot of memory :-)
>
As I had the code open anyway to make that CLEANUP t
On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 11:56:13AM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Willy,
>
> Am 14.03.20 um 11:14 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> > Now done. I've also cleaned up the null-derefw warning in the debugging
> > code of the pools.
> >
>
> Can't the pools simply use `ABORT_NOW()` instead of `*DISGUISE((volat
Willy,
Am 14.03.20 um 11:14 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Now done. I've also cleaned up the null-derefw warning in the debugging
> code of the pools.
>
Can't the pools simply use `ABORT_NOW()` instead of `*DISGUISE((volatile
int *)0) = 0;`?
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 07:07:54PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 05:41:14PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> > Willy,
> >
> > Am 13.03.20 um 17:34 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> > > Indeed, just found it in my queue. However we usually use it
> > > differently, with the function ins
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 05:41:14PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Willy,
>
> Am 13.03.20 um 17:34 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> > Indeed, just found it in my queue. However we usually use it
> > differently, with the function instead of the variable. Do you
> > mind if I adapt it ?
> >
>
> I attempted
Willy,
Am 13.03.20 um 17:34 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Indeed, just found it in my queue. However we usually use it
> differently, with the function instead of the variable. Do you
> mind if I adapt it ?
>
I attempted to use the function, but it didn't compile. I guess because
of a circular depend
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:23:26PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Willy,
>
> Am 09.03.20 um 17:05 schrieb Tim Duesterhus:
> > gcc complains (non-rightfully):
> >
> >> include/common/buf.h: In function 'br_head_pick':
> >> include/common/debug.h:62:4: warning: ignoring return value of 'write',
> >
Willy,
Am 09.03.20 um 17:05 schrieb Tim Duesterhus:
> gcc complains (non-rightfully):
>
>> include/common/buf.h: In function ‘br_head_pick’:
>> include/common/debug.h:62:4: warning: ignoring return value of ‘write’,
>> declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
>> (void)wri
8 matches
Mail list logo