On 2018/8/25 01:30, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 06:18:23PM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
>>> I disagree with making a special case above for maxconn 0. In fact for me
>>> it just means that such a server cannot accept connections, so it simply
>>> doesn't count in the sum, just
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 06:18:23PM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
> > I disagree with making a special case above for maxconn 0. In fact for me
> > it just means that such a server cannot accept connections, so it simply
> > doesn't count in the sum, just as if it were not present.
> On a server, max
On 2018/8/22 04:04, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 06:46:28PM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
>> This adds the sample fetch 'be_conn_free([])'. This sample fetch
>> provides the total number of unused connections across available servers
>> in the specified backend.
>
Hi Patrick,
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 06:46:28PM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
>
> This adds the sample fetch 'be_conn_free([])'. This sample fetch
> provides the total number of unused connections across available servers
> in the specified backend.
Thanks for writing this one, I recently figured
4 matches
Mail list logo