Hi Willy,
Thanks for getting this merged!
Cheers,
Dirkjan
> On 8 Nov 2016, at 13:12, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> Hi Dirkjan,
>
> I finally merged your patch after discussing with Emeric. He's fine with
> it as well. Both of us think that the breakage of openssl 0.9.8 is not a
> showstopper at t
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 01:28:07PM +0200, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> Let's say that we must have settled with a stable-enough version by
> early December. Is there a chance there will be a final 1.7 release by
> then?
Definitely. I hope to have it maybe at the end of next week. Given
that I
On 12:07 Wed 09 Nov , Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 11:44:41AM +0200, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> > Thanks for this. Is it too much of a hassle to ask for a 1.6 backport?
>
> Given that it breaks support for older versions (0.9.8 at least), for
> now it's out of question.
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 11:44:41AM +0200, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> Hi Willy, Dirkjan,
>
> On 21:12 Tue 08 Nov , Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Hi Dirkjan,
> >
> > I finally merged your patch after discussing with Emeric. He's fine with
> > it as well.
>
> Thanks for this. Is it too much of
Hi Willy, Dirkjan,
On 21:12 Tue 08 Nov , Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Dirkjan,
>
> I finally merged your patch after discussing with Emeric. He's fine with
> it as well.
Thanks for this. Is it too much of a hassle to ask for a 1.6 backport?
We currently have a release-critical bug in Debian fo
Hi Dirkjan,
I finally merged your patch after discussing with Emeric. He's fine with
it as well. Both of us think that the breakage of openssl 0.9.8 is not a
showstopper at the moment and that the best way to know if/how it needs to
be fixed is to let it go in the wild. Given that openssl 1.1.0 wa
Just resending, I noticed that my message didn't make it through the list,
and no, it was not caught by the anti-spam :-)
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:19:06PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Dirkjan,
>
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 01:02:33PM +0100, Dirkjan Bussink wrote:
> > Hi Willy,
> >
> > > On 2
Hi Willy,
> On 26 Oct 2016, at 11:40, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> Yes I'd rather have it work with 0.9.8 as it's still supported and used by
> some LTS distros. For example, RHEL5's regular support is due till March 2017
> and extended support till november 2020. It's not very likely that such user
Hi Dirkjan,
sorry for the delay.
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:56:13PM +0200, Dirkjan Bussink wrote:
> I've gone for a somewhat different approach in this patch with a
> compatibility header file. It defines some inline functions from 1.1.0 when
> they are not available. Right now it implements the
Hi Willy,
> On 29 Aug 2016, at 15:15, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> Hi Dirkjan,
>
> CCing Emeric who will know better than me how to respond, but I have some
> questions at the end.
I've gone for a somewhat different approach in this patch with a compatibility
header file. It defines some inline
Hi Dirkjan,
CCing Emeric who will know better than me how to respond, but I have some
questions at the end.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 02:22:23PM +0200, Dirkjan Bussink wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've attached a patch for support for OpenSSL 1.1.0. That version changes
> quite a few things, mostly it ma
11 matches
Mail list logo
