Hi,
As a matter of feedback, I use this patch (on HAProxy 1.4.16, for HTTPS
connexions unwrapped by Stud) in production for almost 4 months, and it
works like a charm.
On 08/07/2011 09:34, Brane F. Gračnar wrote:
On Thursday 07 of July 2011 18:30:10 Sebastien Estienne wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to
Hi All,
After scaling up Stud, @exceliance, we (actually, @emeriBr) worked to
make it able to scale out:
More information here:
http://blog.exceliance.fr/2011/11/07/scaling-out-ssl/
Regards
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Baptiste wrote:
> On the same subject, an excellent article from Vince
On the same subject, an excellent article from Vincent:
http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-session-reuse-rfc5077.html
Good one mate :)
cheers
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Baptiste wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Finally, we've finished our bench on SSL tools available for HAProxy:
> stud an
Hi there,
Finally, we've finished our bench on SSL tools available for HAProxy:
stud and stunnel.
Please read the benchmark here:
http://blog.exceliance.fr/2011/09/16/benchmarking_ssl_performance/
cheers
I wish I have enough time :)
All the bench have been run, just need time to write it down!
cheers
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Sebastien Estienne
wrote:
> could publish some benchmark of haproxy + all best ssl frontend.
> i think it would be really valuable infos for the haproxy community.
>
could publish some benchmark of haproxy + all best ssl frontend.
i think it would be really valuable infos for the haproxy community.
thanx
--
Sebastien E.
Le 23 août 2011 à 13:29, Baptiste a écrit :
> Hi Sebastien,
>
> Actually, bumptech has not yet integrated all the patches developed by Em
Hi Sebastien,
Actually, bumptech has not yet integrated all the patches developed by Emeric.
And the stunnel version used is the one without Exceliance (Emeric
again) patches.
But definitely, stud is interesting.
cheers
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Sebastien Estienne
wrote:
> New benchmar
New benchmark on this topic with haproxy:
http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-benchmark.html
On Saturday, July 9, 2011, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hello Sébastien,
>
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 11:17:12PM +0200, Sébastien Estienne wrote:
>> yes we perfectly understand this, and that is what we l
On Friday 08 of July 2011 23:17:12 Sébastien Estienne wrote:
> http://devblog.bu.mp/introducing-stud ). Today we have the choice between:
> - haproxy 1.4 + patched stunnel
> - haproxy 1.5 dev + stud
> - patched haproxy 1.4 + stud
There is also fourth option:
- patched haproxy 1.4.x + patched stun
Hello Sébastien,
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 11:17:12PM +0200, Sébastien Estienne wrote:
> yes we perfectly understand this, and that is what we like about haproxy.
> But the demand for SSL is growing, it s even mandatory for some use cases.
> Stud looks really promising and solid and a good match for
Sebastien Estienne
On 7 juil. 2011, at 20:10, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Sebastien,
>
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 06:30:10PM +0200, Sebastien Estienne wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'd like to use stud https://github.com/bumptech/stud with Haproxy for
>> SSL support.
>> Stud implement the haproxy prox
Hi Brane,
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 09:34:21AM +0200, Brane F. Gra??nar wrote:
> I'm using accept-proxy patch with haproxy 1.4.15 in production for two months
> without any problems on moderate loaded instance (cca 3k concurrent
> connections, 700-800 reqs/sec)...
thanks for your report.
> Patch
On Thursday 07 of July 2011 18:30:10 Sebastien Estienne wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to use stud https://github.com/bumptech/stud with Haproxy for
> SSL support.
> Stud implement the haproxy proxy protocol, and i'd like to know if
> this will be backported to haproxy 1.4 ?
First, thanks for point
Hi Sebastien,
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 06:30:10PM +0200, Sebastien Estienne wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to use stud https://github.com/bumptech/stud with Haproxy for
> SSL support.
> Stud implement the haproxy proxy protocol, and i'd like to know if
> this will be backported to haproxy 1.4 ?
We
14 matches
Mail list logo
