Re: haproxy tests with sanitizers: bug found ? https://gitlab.com/chipitsine/haproxy/-/jobs/80667862
Thanks, I'll check it out. ср, 11 июл. 2018 г. в 18:20, Frederic Lecaille : > On 07/11/2018 10:41 AM, Frederic Lecaille wrote: > > On 07/10/2018 01:35 PM, Илья Шипицин wrote: > >> Hello, > > > > Hello Ilya, > > > >> I had an idea, what if we will run reg-tests with various sanitizers ? > >> > >> for example, > >> > >> https://gitlab.com/chipitsine/haproxy/-/jobs/80667862 > >> > >> (gcc + sanitize-address). > >> can someone confirm a bug there ? > > > > I confirm there is a little bug, but without any consequence (only a > > memleak). In fact the address sanitizer detects that the loggin buffers > > are allocated twice by the main thread. > > So in fact there is no bug (see Christopher answer: > https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg30622.html). > > After googling, it seems that libasan may produce false positives. > > You must not use it to run reg tests. > > Fred. >
Re: haproxy tests with sanitizers: bug found ? https://gitlab.com/chipitsine/haproxy/-/jobs/80667862
On 07/11/2018 10:41 AM, Frederic Lecaille wrote: On 07/10/2018 01:35 PM, Илья Шипицин wrote: Hello, Hello Ilya, I had an idea, what if we will run reg-tests with various sanitizers ? for example, https://gitlab.com/chipitsine/haproxy/-/jobs/80667862 (gcc + sanitize-address). can someone confirm a bug there ? I confirm there is a little bug, but without any consequence (only a memleak). In fact the address sanitizer detects that the loggin buffers are allocated twice by the main thread. So in fact there is no bug (see Christopher answer: https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg30622.html). After googling, it seems that libasan may produce false positives. You must not use it to run reg tests. Fred.
Re: haproxy tests with sanitizers: bug found ? https://gitlab.com/chipitsine/haproxy/-/jobs/80667862
On 07/10/2018 01:35 PM, Илья Шипицин wrote: Hello, Hello Ilya, I had an idea, what if we will run reg-tests with various sanitizers ? for example, https://gitlab.com/chipitsine/haproxy/-/jobs/80667862 (gcc + sanitize-address). can someone confirm a bug there ? I confirm there is a little bug, but without any consequence (only a memleak). In fact the address sanitizer detects that the loggin buffers are allocated twice by the main thread. I am going to provide a patch which makes your test pass in another thread. Thank you.
Re: haproxy tests with sanitizers: bug found ? https://gitlab.com/chipitsine/haproxy/-/jobs/80667862
just for the record, asan was very easy to enable: https://gitlab.com/chipitsine/haproxy/blob/master/.gitlab-ci.yml вт, 10 июл. 2018 г. в 16:35, Илья Шипицин : > Hello, > > I had an idea, what if we will run reg-tests with various sanitizers ? > > for example, > > https://gitlab.com/chipitsine/haproxy/-/jobs/80667862 > > (gcc + sanitize-address). > can someone confirm a bug there ? > > "AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on" > > > I'll add more sanitizers later. > thanks for your attention! > > Ilya Shipitsin >
