Sure, go ahead.
Op vr 15 mei 2020 om 20:24 schreef Илья Шипицин :
> I mean, I will include your fix into next spellcheck patch if you do not
> mind
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2020, 11:22 PM Olaf Buitelaar
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Илья Шипицин,
>>
>> The codespell looks really cool. But i'm sorry, I cannot
I mean, I will include your fix into next spellcheck patch if you do not
mind
On Fri, May 15, 2020, 11:22 PM Olaf Buitelaar
wrote:
> Hi Илья Шипицин,
>
> The codespell looks really cool. But i'm sorry, I cannot really find how i
> can add a check for this case, otherwise i would be happy to add
Hi Илья Шипицин,
The codespell looks really cool. But i'm sorry, I cannot really find how i
can add a check for this case, otherwise i would be happy to add it.
Best Olaf
Op vr 15 mei 2020 om 16:21 schreef Илья Шипицин :
> that's a typo.
>
>
> we established weekly "codespell" check
> here's
that's a typo.
we established weekly "codespell" check
here's example of check:
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/runs/665274281?check_suite_focus=true
I submit spell fixes from time to time, I may include your fix as well if
you do not mind
(it was impossible to catch "an" <--> "and" from
4 matches
Mail list logo