Subject: [Hardhats-members] Another oddity - scope of NEW in DSM
A co-worker just pointed out the following oddity that occurs in DSM,
but not in Cache:
N A S A=100 W A
100
N A S A=100
W A
%DSM-E-UNDEF, undefined variable A
-DSM-I-ECODE, MUMPS error code: M6
Reviewing sections 7.1.2.2
PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 8:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Another oddity - scope of NEW in DSM
--- steven mcphelan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is nothing wrong with either DSM nor Cache. Both are strictly
within
the ANSI
in the
standard is the 'programmer mode' mentioned at all.
Regards,
Richard.
From: Greg Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/03/10 Thu PM 04:36:15 GMT
To: Hardhats hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Hardhats-members] Another oddity - scope of NEW in DSM
A co-worker just pointed out
in the standard is
the 'programmer mode' mentioned at all.
Regards,
Richard.
From: Greg Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/03/10 Thu PM 04:36:15 GMT
To: Hardhats hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Hardhats-members] Another oddity - scope of NEW in DSM
A co-worker just
To: Hardhats hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Hardhats-members] Another oddity - scope of NEW in DSM
A co-worker just pointed out the following oddity that occurs in
DSM,
but not in Cache:
N A S A=100 W A
100
N A S A=100
W A
%DSM-E-UNDEF, undefined
wondering where in the
standard is the 'programmer mode' mentioned at all.
Regards,
Richard.
From: Greg Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/03/10 Thu PM 04:36:15 GMT
To: Hardhats hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Hardhats-members] Another oddity - scope
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 09:23 -0800, Greg Woodhouse wrote:
My co-worker (I'll have to try and entice him to join the list!) also
pointed out that you can QUIT out of different levels in Cache to
achieve the same effect.
Again, my point is not to say that one platform is better or worse than
I was unsure of what rules might apply to symbol table management in
direct mode. It occured to me that the difference between Cache on and
DSM could have been driven either by the desire to provide a new
feature (not tying variable scope to line structure in programmer mode)
or implementation
and then come back to examine local variables or resume some process.
- Original Message -
From: Bhaskar, KS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 11:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Another oddity - scope of NEW in DSM
On Thu, 2005-03-10
