OK,
I was able to get my installation of Vista configured and it looks like I was
able to allocate menu's and keys. I am now wanting to find the correct entry
point
so that my first screen that comes up is the ACCESS and VERIFY CODE. I think
it is
D ^XUP, but was not sure??
Butch Jones
Now that I have my install going, I was wanting some help in setting up a
printer.
I am running Windows 2000 Pro and Cache.
Do I need to set up the printer in both the Cache Cube and also in the device
file
of VISTA?
And if so, can you point me in the direction?
Thanks,
Butch Jones
Butch,
I have some experience setting up printers in GT.M,
but not cache'. I think it is much easier in Cache'.
If no one else can help get you going, let me know.
Kevin
--- Butch Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that I have my install going, I was wanting some
help in setting up a
ZU is for tied terminals, and XUS is for programmers to get into production
mode.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Toppenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 4:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Entry point or routine to start
If you want to invoke an option from programmer mode use ^XUP. If you
want a routine to be called when you sign on (not after you go to
programmer mode, use ^ZU). Finally, ^XUS is the sign on routine. What
makes this confusing is that in Linux or UNIX people normally sign in
using their own
To extend the analogy (maybe stretch would be a better word), in
Linux (or in this case, OS X) you can start a new shell like this
~:$ bash
~:$
(I use a different prompt for subshells.)
In VistA, you can't use the same command, so ^XUP is provided. If you
just want to go through the sign in
How about an unintended feature?
--- Joseph Dal Molin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is really great Kevin!!!and to think that this came out of
sorting out the WINE issues with those last two tabs...that makes it
way coolturn a bug into a feature...are you sure you didn't
intern
So if I connect via a SSH shell and have my .bashrc automatically launch into GT.M and then on into VistA, would that be a "tied terminal". I think so.
Kevin
Chris Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ZU is for tied terminals, and XUS is for programmers to get into productionmode.- Original
OK, now I remember,
d ^XUS signs the user in (asking for the access code), and then asks for which menu option to launch.
d ^ZU signs the user in (asking for access code and verify code) and then launches the menu option designated as their default in their user record (in file 200)
Kevin
Sniff Don't you like it? Sniff. :-)
It certainly is a course that the VA didn't choose to persue. But some may find it helpful.
Kevin
Greg Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about an "unintended feature"?--- Joseph Dal Molin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: This is really great
Hi,
What Order Dialog values are used in the ORWDX WRITE ORDERS parameter
for the Demo CPRS?
The CPRS demo Orders Tab has a different Write Orders List box than the
one I have on my box. I have CPRS 1.0.24.27 installed. Could it be that the
parameters set are different in both the systems? Any
The VA Demo takes 1.0.23.15. Please tell me how to go find this parameter
value.
On Wednesday 04 May 2005 04:58 pm, Madhavi Bagepalli wrote:
Hi,
What Order Dialog values are used in the ORWDX WRITE ORDERS parameter
for the Demo CPRS?
The CPRS demo Orders Tab has a different Write Orders
Hey...that's not what I meant!
I think it's an interesating idea, though I'm not sure how it would be
used in practice (so to speak). How do you envision this feature being
used?
--- Kevin Toppenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sniff Don't you like it? Sniff. :-)
It certainly is a course
As a way of viewing scanned images, like scanned consultation letters, or perhaps even photos of the patient etc.
Some in our group are not happy that the notes do not support formatting (i.e. bold etc). This would give a method of doing that.
But as per my other post, there are other secondary
Another use would be to include either predefined or user modified
drawings/images in the notes.to add clarification to the written
text...more importantly IMHO it provides a very interesting new lego
block with far more potential than I am sure we can imagine right now
Joseph
Kevin
One of the upcoming versions of CPRS will allow inclusion of a patient's
photograph with his/her notes. For those who deal with literally thousands
of patients, if photographs are attached to the record there is an expected
increase in patient safety.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Thanks Greg,
This answers another piece of the puzzle. When I viewed the ZU routine it
looks
like it actually calls XUS. I had to comment out the code after the linetag
JOBCHK
because I was getting an error, but all went well after that.
Butch Jones
Francis beat me to the punch. A simple patient photo is a very handy
thing to have in the medical record. (Needs to be easily obtained, and
easily displayed, and printable.)
Kevin may just be having fun with his Delphi skills. Not a bad way to
stay out of trouble, I say.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
18 matches
Mail list logo
