On Mar 17, 2006, at 10:40 PM, Floyd Dennis wrote:
Only current use of ICD-10 I've heard has been coding causes of
death and
significant conditions on death certificates. Its use varies from
state to
state.
I see...If you're watching ER and a patient codes and is later
resuscitated, it
On 3/18/06, Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see...If you're watching ER and a patient codes and is later
resuscitated, it must have been ICD-9-CM, otherwise it was ICD-10.
:-|
OK, if the patients AICD fails and has a resulting IVCD, and his code
is DC'd then maybe use ICD-10...
On Mar 18, 2006, at 1:51 PM, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
On 3/18/06, Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see...If you're watching ER and a patient codes and is later
resuscitated, it must have been ICD-9-CM, otherwise it was ICD-10.
:-|
OK, if the patients AICD fails and has a
None that Im aware of.
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Krawitz
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 2:06
PM
To:
hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Hardhats-members] icd 10
coding
Is there any timeframe to update
I don't think ICD 10 is being used in practice, is it?
Kevin
On 3/17/06, Cameron Schlehuber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
None that I'm aware of.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marc Krawitz
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 2:06 PM
]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: 2006-03-17 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] icd 10 coding
I don't think ICD 10 is being used in practice, is it?
Kevin
On 3/17/06, Cameron Schlehuber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
None that I'm aware of.
-Original Message-
From
On Mar 17, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Marc Krawitz wrote:
Is there any timeframe to update VistA with ICD 10 codes?
Thanks,
Marc
Is there anything to stop members of the open source community from
doing it themselves?
===
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A perfectly rational dog placed
this may not be relevant to the
question.
Best regards,
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Toppenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: 2006-03-17 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] icd 10 coding
I don't think ICD 10 is being used in practice
The lack of a burning desire to have it and no place to use it if you did have
it might have something to do with a lack of interest in doing it.
On Friday 17 March 2006 19:41, Gregory Woodhouse wrote:
On Mar 17, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Marc Krawitz wrote:
Is there any timeframe to update VistA with
On Mar 17, 2006, at 6:09 PM, Nancy Anthracite wrote:
it might have something to do with a lack of interest in doing it.
That could do it.
===
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Design quality doesn't ensure success, but design failure can ensure
failure.
--Kent Beck
2006 3:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] icd 10 coding
On Mar 17, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Marc Krawitz wrote:
Is there any timeframe to update VistA with ICD 10 codes?
Thanks,
Marc
Is there anything to stop members of the open source community from
doing it themselves?
===
Gregory
.
-- George Carlin
Floyd Dennis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Kevin Toppenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 18:39:49 -0500
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] icd 10 coding
I don't think ICD 10
12 matches
Mail list logo
