From: joeuser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Spyware Woes
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 00:48:22 -0500
Trying to clean a compromised system from within the compromised system is
fraught with
At 01:33 AM 10/05/2005, Carroll Kong wrote:
My friend is infected with a particularly nasty Spyware of sorts. It
appears to have modified his control panel's display settings so he cannot
change his background anymore. He claims his login has been modified as
well from the standard select a
- Original Message -
From: Hayes Elkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 2:01 AM
Subject: Re: [H] Spyware Woes
Trying to clean a compromised system from within the compromised system is
fraught with peril and failure. Furthermore, it sounds
A lot of professionals agree on this point - it can help answer a lot of
questions also - when you format nothing is left to chance... I agree
with you also though and I have not let the terrorists win often but
sometimes it is the best solution and one that makes me certain the
terrorists
At 06:44 AM 5/10/2005, Thane Sherrington typed:
If you can't run in Safe Mode, you will have to run the Spyware scans
repeatedly to see if you are actually getting rid of the spyware.
There is always XpPe or BartPe which is only great for this kind of stuff
if I do say so myself.
I have an Asus A8N-SLI deluxe board, and an Athlon XP 3000+ Barton.
I purchased Corsair Value Select ram, 2 512 meg sticks. IT was supposed to
be DDR400/PC3200.
I ran some benchmarks on it lately because it didn't seem as fast as it
should be. I went into the BIOS and it is only being
At 07:11 AM 5/10/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
My vote goes for the formatters. I did Windows tune-ups and cleanups for
years. They took about as long as a format and reinstall job. The format
and reinstall worked every time unless there was hardware problems. The
tune-up is pot luck.
When you
At 09:28 AM 10/05/2005, Wayne Johnson wrote:
At 06:44 AM 5/10/2005, Thane Sherrington typed:
If you can't run in Safe Mode, you will have to run the Spyware scans
repeatedly to see if you are actually getting rid of the spyware.
There is always XpPe or BartPe which is only great for this kind of
At 08:50 AM 5/10/2005, Thane Sherrington typed:
BartPE is the only way to go.
Do you use an Explorer shell or the default Nu2menu ?
--+--
Wayne D. Johnson
Ashland, OH, USA 44805
http://www.wavijo.com
Thanks Jim, this looks like what I need. I'll let you know how it turns
out.
Bobby
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 4:13 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: RE: [H] Nero and MPEG--DVD
At 10:32 AM 10/05/2005, Carroll Kong wrote:
I actually destroyed/eliminated all the other spywares already. Yes, I am
aware of regenerative ones, I can eliminate those as well and it has been
done already. I suppose too much experience with killing windows spyware
and linux trojans. :) The
Thane Sherrington wrote:
At 10:32 AM 10/05/2005, Carroll Kong wrote:
I actually destroyed/eliminated all the other spywares already. Yes,
I am aware of regenerative ones, I can eliminate those as well and it
has been done already. I suppose too much experience with killing
windows spyware and
Could it be that you need to set the bus speed to 400 in the BIOS?
In my motherboard, to do dual channel, you had to put the RAM in certain
locations. Could that be your issue?
That RAM should be ok. A lower latency RAM would give you a small boost,
but the average user would not notice it,
It shows up as dual channel when it is posting, but it comes up as DDR 266
instead of 400.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bobby Heid
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 11:14 AM
To: 'The Hardware List'
Subject: RE: [H] RE: Confused with Ram
Yes, flashed it to the newest version. I'm wondering if maybe I was sent
the wrong ram. I'll have to wait until tonight to power it down. I am
correct though, DDR266 is much slower than what I should have...right?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
xp 3000 barton on a A8N-SLI
fp
:-}
At 05:29 AM 5/10/2005, Chris Klein Poked the stick with:
I have an Asus A8N-SLI deluxe
board, and an Athlon XP 3000+ Barton.
I purchased Corsair Value Select ram, 2 512 meg sticks. IT was
supposed to
be DDR400/PC3200.
I ran some benchmarks on it
At 12:28 PM 10/05/2005, Chris Klein wrote:
Yes, flashed it to the newest version. I'm wondering if maybe I was sent
the wrong ram. I'll have to wait until tonight to power it down. I am
correct though, DDR266 is much slower than what I should have...right?
Yes. PC3200 is DDR400.
T
---
[This
At 11:26 AM 10/05/2005, Carroll Kong wrote:
activists who would prefer to use their computer in peace. As long as I
kill the popups, account for every system process running, monitor changed
files over time, you can be pretty sure it is OK unless they created a new
Windows kernel mod like the
I'm retarded this morning...this is the exact ram I bought. I know it's
cheap ram, but it should be posting as DDR400 as far as I can tell
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16820146299
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
I've never met a system infected that could not be fixed. CWS slaying has
been my specialty. Eliminating it has gone from over 4 hours (my own first
infection) to a matter of minutes.
Reformatting is always a cop out.
From: joeuser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: The Hardware List
Check appinitdlls section of the registry - it's an legacy windows NT
reference that can launch programs upon startup. It is overlooked when
scanning services and windows\run sections.
From: Thane Sherrington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
To: The
At 12:50 PM 10/05/2005, Hayes Elkins wrote:
I've never met a system infected that could not be fixed. CWS slaying has
been my specialty. Eliminating it has gone from over 4 hours (my own first
infection) to a matter of minutes.
Care to give us a rundown of you method of attack on a CWS
At 12:43 PM 10/05/2005, Chris Klein wrote:
I'm retarded this morning...this is the exact ram I bought. I know it's
cheap ram, but it should be posting as DDR400 as far as I can tell
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16820146299
I think it should. I'd try a single stick, and
You've certainly opened my eyes...
Hayes Elkins wrote:
Reformatting is always a cop out.
--
Cheers,
joeuser (still looking for the 'any' key)
At 01:04 PM 10/05/2005, joeuser wrote:
It's NOT necessary - aren't you listening?
LOL!
T
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Anti-Virus]
From: Thane Sherrington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Spyware Woes
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 13:00:25 -0300
At 12:50 PM 10/05/2005, Hayes Elkins wrote:
I've never met a system infected that
Chris,
Here are the forums for Mushkin:
http://forums.mushkin.com/phpbb2/
See if any of these might help:
http://forums.mushkin.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=1772highlight=a8nsli
http://forums.mushkin.com/phpbb2/search.php?mode=results
I looked around a bit and the only thing (not exhaustive) is
At 08:19 AM 5/10/2005, you wrote:
It shows up as dual channel when it is posting, but it comes up as DDR 266
instead of 400.
Ram will default to what the motherboard / CPU requires. It is not going to
run faster then that unless you tell it to in the BIOS.
figured that, maybe the ram is running synchronous with the
cpu, I for one am confused about the way they handle FSB.
fp
luck
At 08:41 AM 5/10/2005, Chris Klein Poked the stick with:
Sorry, major typo. I was
looking at the wrong packing list. ItÂ’s an Athlon 64 3000+
Winchester core
[EMAIL
If you consider malware (forget annoying spyware) may be installed not
detected, an exploit is an exploit the payloads can be anything, then
there is a very good reason to consider reformat.
A diary of what's installed, novel idea. I've never kept one for my
life, much less my PC. Would you
Sorry I had a brain fart earlier. This is an Athlon 64 3000+ Winchester
core
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of warpmedia
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 3:00 PM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re: [H] RE: Confused with Ram
That would be
At 12:05 PM 5/10/2005, you wrote:
Well I'm basking the glow of 4Mb now that my drop is replaced and my new
SB-5100 ($58 ebay) is online. Now the debate as to whether or not $15
more/mo to do 6Mb is worth it. 8)
When I started with COX back in October of 99 I think, there were few users
on the
32 matches
Mail list logo
