Re: [H] [N] IDF 2006 - Conroe Performance

2006-03-08 Thread Jin-Wei Tioh
At 10:47 PM 3/7/2006, you wrote: Oh snap! Nice to see that Intel isn't resting on their laurels... Competition is healthy and I don't think that this chip would be where it is if it were not for AMD. I've been a AMD nut for awhile, but Intel is starting to look better with this. I didn't

Re: [H] Failure Cars Standard with Wings was....

2006-03-08 Thread Stan Zaske
I'm not spelling doom and gloom for AMD. Believe me I'm on the side of the underdog in this case and agree that if AMD pulls out the stops between now and Summer they can debut an AM2 architecture powerful enough to provide a viable upgrade path and continue their growth. However, Intel was

Re: [H] [N] IDF 2006 - Conroe Performance

2006-03-08 Thread Thane Sherrington (S)
At 07:25 PM 07/03/2006, Jin-Wei Tioh wrote: Want to be the first so say Hot Damn! : http://www.anandtech.com/tradeshows/showdoc.aspx?i=2713 That's an insane performance lead, from the 2.6GHz part no less. The 3.3GHz EE will pw3n the FX line so bad it's not even funny. Looks good, but I'd

Re: [H] [N] IDF 2006 - Conroe Performance

2006-03-08 Thread Analyst
On 8 Mar 2006 at 15:21, Julian Zottl wrote: lol, makes me wonder, did they go back to one of the PIII cores and throw in some M tech. hahahaha. According to IT Jungle: The new Core Microarchitecture, which is a derivative of the Pentium M processor for laptops, is the foundation of the

[H] Frozen Dead Guy Days

2006-03-08 Thread Al
http://www.nederlandchamber.org/FrozenDeadGuyDays/index.html Some crazy people up in them thar hills. The coffin race is great. Al

Re: [H] Frozen Dead Guy Days

2006-03-08 Thread Thane Sherrington (S)
At 06:09 PM 08/03/2006, Al wrote: http://www.nederlandchamber.org/FrozenDeadGuyDays/index.html Some crazy people up in them thar hills. The coffin race is great. I wish we had a festival like this in our town. T

Re: [H] Failure Cars Standard with Wings was....

2006-03-08 Thread Thane Sherrington (S)
At 07:51 PM 08/03/2006, Hayes Elkins wrote: It really happened, I just got the age wrong. 14, my bad. And I agree - never respect fools, or stupid religions, or the murderous subhuman filth who use fairy tales to justify the killing of innocent people. And it appears the citizenry didn't

Re: [H] Failure Cars Standard with Wings was....

2006-03-08 Thread G.Waleed Kavalec
On 3/8/06, Hayes Elkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But never respect fools who spread inflammatory nonsense like this.Oh but it is not nonsense!It really happened, I just got the age wrong. 14, my bad. And I agree -never respect fools, or stupid religions, or the murderous subhuman filth who use

Re: [H] Failure Cars Standard with Wings was....

2006-03-08 Thread G.Waleed Kavalec
On 3/8/06, Gary VanderMolen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And it appears the citizenry didn't want him buried in the cemetary either.It never ceases to amaze me how much of an asshole major religions make god out to be.Here's a secret:If he's a loving god, he doesn't give a shit if you eat whatever

Re: [H] Failure Cars Standard with Wings was....

2006-03-08 Thread Hayes Elkins
From: G.Waleed Kavalec [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com Subject: Re: [H] Failure Cars Standard with Wings was Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 19:40:46 -0600 On 3/8/06, Hayes Elkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [H] Failure Cars Standard with Wings was....

2006-03-08 Thread Hayes Elkins
From: G.Waleed Kavalec [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com Subject: Re: [H] Failure Cars Standard with Wings was Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 19:41:17 -0600 On 3/8/06, Gary VanderMolen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [H] Failure Cars Standard with Wings was....

2006-03-08 Thread Hayes Elkins
From: Hayes Elkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com Subject: Re: [H] Failure Cars Standard with Wings was Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 21:19:50 -0500 From: G.Waleed Kavalec [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: The Hardware List