I have a Thinkpad X41 Tablet. It came with half a GB soldered on the
board and a half a GB of upgradable SODIMM PC2-5300 CL=5
Unbuffered NON-ECC DDR2-667. Manufacturer specifications call for
up to 1GB SODMIM or a maximum amount of RAM of a 1.5 GB.
A crucial 2GB SODIMM isn't much more
The specific client is very important with regard to searching. For example,
with Outlook 2007 index-based search (using Windows Desktop Search as the
engine), I can search through a 10+GB mailbox in a couple seconds--including
filters.
To me, webmail is only useful when on the go...and with my m
occasionally Eudora inbound is slow or hangs on program startup, almost like
Eudora opens and tries to connect b4 it is actually connected to the server. re
try after open and it usually is OK. Did have to change the port .(outboound)
one account I have to check authentication allowed, the others
All,
Can I please this very divergent opinion-fest to a close. I did suspect
my question to cause this. I seem to be gifted with this. I'm not nearly
as bright or well-connected as the List seems to be.
I have done what Neil told me to do. I now know that I have an ESET
glitch with Thunderbird
Disclaimer: I'm writing this from OSX Mail.app.
In general I still prefer offline mail readers. Gmail+IMAP integrates
perfectly with mail.app, so my gmail recipes+tags and everything work
perfectly in conjunction with offline reading.
HOWEVER... I might take issue with the "far faster" stat
some spammer is probably using your address or domain, so they have
blocked you. Like they wrote, you can request they remove the block,
or probably easier just to get a Hotmail or Gmail account to send
to anybody on Verizon domain
At 01:20 PM 6/6/2009, you wrote:
I keep getting the follo
Far faster and far more features. Offline email handling isn't exactly
possible with web based email either.
Backup of your email is something a bit difficult to do as well. Especially
with Gmail.
-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwar
Yeah, you're exactly right...I'm sure Redhat and maybe a couple others
could afford to do the standards compliance, testing, etc that would
be required, but honestly, it's not worth it. Not sure why it was
worth it to Apple.
There are definitely issues with compiling programs depending on
Likewise, I find web-based mail unbearably slow when compared to the
snappiness of desktop mail clients.
As for the touted portability of webmail, I seldom travel, but when I do,
I bring my laptop along.
Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (Mail)
--
From: "G
I keep getting the following message when I send to these people.
Has Verizon got it in for me?
How do they do this?
Is there any way I can get messages to my friends that use Verizon now
by email.
Sam
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail.oregonfast.net.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliv
Thunderbird user here and I too find web based email to be slow and clunky.
Gary Jackson wrote:
Well, everyone has their preferred way of doing things. I like
Exchange/Outlook the best for me ( currently working to put together a
server to host my own domain at home ). At my last job
You are prolly right, it doesn't amount to a hill of beans that I can
see.
Apple, being a publicly traded corporation, maybe wanted to get SUS
certed to be on the safe side.. (Just guessing here)
I've never had an issue running Ubuntu and a couple of other Linux
derivatives for a couple
Well, everyone has their preferred way of doing things. I like
Exchange/Outlook the best for me ( currently working to put together a
server to host my own domain at home ). At my last job, I was a
Domino/Notes Admin ( along with being A network Admin ) and while I think
Outlook works
I am probably missing something real basic here, but a couple of
questions come to mind...
1. Is there really anything to be gained for any of the Linux companies to
get that certification ? Looks like it costs a boatload of money to get
the offical compliance.
2. Everyone has their
You do realize that it's already there, right? Unless you are using PGP for
every email, they are flying around open text on the internet and bouncing
from mail server to mail server. We're just sending postcards around,
trusting that the post office employees (or anyone else watching the stream)
You do realize that it's already there, right? Unless you are using PGP for
every email, they are flying around open text on the internet and bouncing
from mail server to mail server. We're just sending postcards around,
trusting that the post office employees (or anyone else watching the stream)
and I do not understand why anyone would want their personal info on someone
else's server. not in this day and age.
fp
At 04:11 AM 6/6/2009, Brian Weeden Poked the stick with:
>Frankly, I don't understand why anyone still uses Outlook or any other stand
>alone email client.
>
>---
>Brian
>
>On
Frankly, I don't understand why anyone still uses Outlook or any other stand
alone email client.
---
Brian
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 9:32 PM, FORC5 wrote:
> Hope not
>
> fp
>
> At 05:50 PM 6/5/2009, Winterlight Poked the stick with:
> >At 03:25 PM 6/5/2009, you wrote:
> >>Email has had to evolve o
Interesting.
Just read up on that, and yep, OSX is fully POSIX and *Nix compliant,
and is Unix 03 certified on the SUS side,
while no release of Linux has made it to SUS certification as of
now. :)
Cool beans. :)
On Jun 5, 2009, at 12:24 PM, Scott Sipe wrote:
Not all correct.
19 matches
Mail list logo
