Re: [H] FireFox confusion

Sold me, thanks. Jamie Furtner wrote: IE Tab works fine with Firefox 3.5.[01] - I use it to avoid having to pull up IE. Jamie swzaske wrote: Down with IE is right but I still have to use it far too often because a web site fails to render properly in Firefox. Wish I could get rid of IE ent

Re: [H] FireFox confusion

gt;>> Duncan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thane Sherrington wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> At 12:30 PM 22/07/2009, DSinc wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10292587-83.html >>

Re: [H] FireFox confusion

pdate again to v3.5.1. :) Does anyone on the List use the new v3.5.1? Can I still use/add NoScript and CS-Lite to this new version? I'm on 3.5.1 and noscript with no problems. Definitely upgrade. T __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature dat

Re: [H] FireFox confusion

Have all my machines up to v3.0.12 ATM, but I detect a strong push >>>>> to update again to v3.5.1. :) >>>>> >>>>> Does anyone on the List use the new v3.5.1? >>>>> >>>>> Can I still use/add NoScript and CS-Lite to this new version? >>>> >>>> I'm on 3.5.1 and noscript with no problems. Definitely upgrade. >>>> >>>> T >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4267 (20090722) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com Protected by Websense Hosted Email Security -- www.websense.com

Re: [H] FireFox confusion

on from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4267 (20090722) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com

Re: [H] FireFox confusion

Stan, I still use IE also. My banking/investment sites (4) continue to have trouble with FF too often for me. But, I accept that "they" will figure out "their" troubles and update as necessary. Patience is in place. Best, Duncan swzaske wrote: Down with IE is right but I still have to use it

Re: [H] FireFox confusion

Scott, Thank you. Yes, after so peeking/poking I found it some weeks back. Needed to find it regarding a fix to the JRE FF packs with itself and how to update it. So, I can assume that when I formally de-install some version of FF and specify "leave my setting/stuff" alone, that this lo

Re: [H] FireFox confusion

IE Tab works fine with Firefox 3.5.[01] - I use it to avoid having to pull up IE. Jamie swzaske wrote: Down with IE is right but I still have to use it far too often because a web site fails to render properly in Firefox. Wish I could get rid of IE entirely. Should try IE Tab and see if it wo

Re: [H] FireFox confusion

Down with IE is right but I still have to use it far too often because a web site fails to render properly in Firefox. Wish I could get rid of IE entirely. Should try IE Tab and see if it works with 3.5.1. DSinc wrote: All, The deed is done! All my units now use FireFox v3.5.1. Interestingly

Re: [H] FireFox confusion

Good tip, thanks! Scott Sipe wrote: For what it's worth, I use a firefox plugin called HTML Validator that adds an html validator to the "view source" page. It seems like it's rarely updated and never works with the newest firefoxes, but you can go into the plugin directory (your firefox prof

[H] Microsoft: Windows 7 is done, on its way to manufacturers

http://bit.ly/udq72

Re: [H] FireFox confusion

If you do want to know a little bit about the magic, the firefox profile directory lives in For 2000/XP: C:\Documents and Settings\username\Application Data\Firefox Scott On Jul 22, 2009, at 4:12 PM, DSinc wrote: All, The deed is done! All my units now use FireFox v3.5.1. Interestingly,

Re: [H] FireFox confusion

All, The deed is done! All my units now use FireFox v3.5.1. Interestingly, I observe that FF seems to hide some "user data" in its' own sequestered space. Even though I fully de-installed v3.0.12 first; when v3.5.1 did install next, it found all my "user data" and just trucked on to completion!

Re: [H] FireFox confusion

For what it's worth, I use a firefox plugin called HTML Validator that adds an html validator to the "view source" page. It seems like it's rarely updated and never works with the newest firefoxes, but you can go into the plugin directory (your firefox profile directory/ extensions/extension

Re: [H] FireFox confusion

At 12:30 PM 22/07/2009, DSinc wrote: http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10292587-83.html So I stumble across the above cnet article about FireFox. Have all my machines up to v3.0.12 ATM, but I detect a strong push to update again to v3.5.1. :) Does anyone on the List use the new v3.5.1?

Re: [H] FireFox confusion

Not compatible with all my plug ins and I'm sure it's more advanced (especially with HTML 5 etc.) but not noticeably for my purposes. I use it but Meh! DSinc wrote: http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10292587-83.html So I stumble across the above cnet article about FireFox. Have all my machine

Re: [H] FireFox confusion

Should go quickly. Been using it too... BTW: Yep + don't know. Rick Glazier From: "DSinc" Thanks Brian. I'll spend today updating to FireFox v3.5.1. :)

Re: [H] FireFox confusion

Thanks Brian. I'll spend today updating to FireFox v3.5.1. :) Brian Weeden wrote: Yep and yep. --- Brian Weeden Technical Advisor Secure World Foundation +1 (514) 466-2756 Canada +1 (202) 683-8534 US On Wed, Jul 22, 2009

Re: [H] FireFox confusion

Been using FF 3.5.x since it came out... :) -- JRS stei...@pacbell.net Facts do not cease to exist just because they are ignored. - Original Message > From: DSinc > To: Hardware Group > Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 8:30:17 AM > Subject: [H] FireFox confusion > > http://news

Re: [H] FireFox confusion

Yep and yep. --- Brian Weeden Technical Advisor Secure World Foundation +1 (514) 466-2756 Canada +1 (202) 683-8534 US On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:30 AM, DSinc wrote: > http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10292587-83.html > > So I stumb

[H] FireFox confusion

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10292587-83.html So I stumble across the above cnet article about FireFox. Have all my machines up to v3.0.12 ATM, but I detect a strong push to update again to v3.5.1. :) Does anyone on the List use the new v3.5.1? Can I still use/add NoScript and CS-