from
scattered fragments.
On 5/27/2010 8:02 AM, Thane Sherrington wrote:
At 11:52 AM 27/05/2010, Scoobydo wrote:
MyDefrag huh? Guess I'll be downloading that myself..
Good, then the two of us can gang up on maccrawj and get him to give us
all his scripts. :)
T
Funny thing is that MyDefrag is using the MS defrag API! MyDefrag is just better at
making the decisions what to move.
On 5/27/2010 9:05 AM, Thane Sherrington wrote:
At 12:12 PM 27/05/2010, DSinc wrote:
Thane,
I will give MyDefrag-431 a try, though I am not a script-maven.
I have been testing
huh? Guess I'll be downloading that myself..
Good, then the two of us can gang up on maccrawj and get him to give us
all his scripts. :)
T
Reminds me of the serial/parallel syncing thing from the 90's.
On 5/27/2010 9:30 AM, Thane Sherrington wrote:
Anyone use this thing?
http://www.thetornado.com/backup_files.asp
I've written a program to do this, but this looks pretty good.
T
The Rosewill bridge I have came with it's own PSU can be attached w/o removing the
drive, very nice.
I'm writing a powershell script to get file details, launch md5deep to calc the md5,
and then store the results in CSV file to have a DB for this type of testing. There
are some degree of
exposure to get a customer base show 'em I'm cheaper
and better than the store front shops + Geek Squad... ;)
On 5/26/2010 4:36 AM, Thane Sherrington wrote:
At 11:54 PM 25/05/2010, maccrawj wrote:
Any reason not to just scan with the customer drive attached to a
bench machine as a data volume
This I can relate to, eSATA would def. be better as would USB 3.0 I think.
On 5/26/2010 4:37 AM, Thane Sherrington wrote:
At 11:57 PM 25/05/2010, maccrawj wrote:
Yeah, now that I think about it didn't we all discuss this AV scanner
machine w/ USB-IDE/SATA converter idea a few years ago?
I've
This is my understanding also. GS has a flat rate for onsite plus they charge to
backup, never mind restore, your data. Haven't looked recently but GS had their rates
spelled out on their site last time I checked.
On 5/26/2010 5:36 AM, Joe User wrote:
Check out others around you. Geek Squad
are and how expensive dumb multi-bay drive
enclosures are never mind the smart stuff like Drobo.
On 5/26/2010 5:58 AM, Christopher Fisk wrote:
On Wed, 26 May 2010, Thane Sherrington wrote:
At 11:54 PM 25/05/2010, maccrawj wrote:
Any reason not to just scan with the customer drive attached
All great services suggestions, should create customer loyalty. Ha! Meanwhile it
seems generally customer's will shell out $100's to GS to not even fix a problem but
tend to hesitate when given the honest offer of truly needed options upgrades to
prevent problems from returning or keeping a
Bigger question is will it help with the crushing load of Flash? hehe...
XP was the last not to bloated version IMO.
Assume you do not have the issue with new blank document?
Found this with Google:
That will happen as long as the document contains tracked changes. It's
basically there to protect you--to prevent you from thinking you can send
the document to
Wish they would either restore the disable VPU recover option or at least allow
some configuration over how it's watchdog senses issues. STALKER:CoP is so flaky and
never survives a VPU recover.
Thanks for the heads up, downloading to review...
5/26/2010 7:49 PM, Scoobydo wrote:
Grab em
Any reason not to just scan with the customer drive attached to a bench machine as a
data volume bypass the OS completely? I've come to the conclusion that scanning
with a host OS of unknown state is just not reliable anyway.
Imaging the system, a good preventative measure anyway, then
Yeah, now that I think about it didn't we all discuss this AV scanner machine w/
USB-IDE/SATA converter idea a few years ago?
Image AV scan using this method are the 1st things I do when working on a box these
days.
On 5/25/2010 3:25 PM, Christopher Fisk wrote:
snip
Yank drive: Plug in USB
My real world test is Usenet downloads DD-Wrt's bandwidth monitor. Doesn't max the
LAN's speed though.
Netio Iperf come to mind as benchmarks.
On 5/25/2010 3:54 AM, Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
Is there no software available to continuously test bandwidth over a
network connection (ethernet,
Well poking around only netted me people resolving this by disabling powerplay. With
my 3870X2 VisionTek actually released a BIOS update which raised the clocks to
constant normal operational levels which effectively removed power play and solved
the problem for their customers including me.
The 9800 is actually supported under Windows 7? I though it got lumped in with the
rest of the pre-directX 10 stuff as no longer supported (at all) by CCC above 6.5?
Just my $.02, but I'll bet it's running in VGA compatibility mode and that's all it
will ever do.
On 5/22/2010 6:29 PM, GPL
Yes, but then there is the potential for long term wear out from rewrites for
pagefile temp folders. Tell me it's worth it in 3-5 years.
On 5/22/2010 3:23 AM, Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
I've been using one now for 5 months. It's great..wouldn't consider
changing or going back now. Also, a lot
Personally I do not find W7 any more intensive than XP short of using Aero or the
overhead from some of the unneeded convenience services like search indexer.
Sure runs fine on my Atom N330 and would have run fine on my P4 2.4Ghz Dell Latitude
C840 if bastards at ATI Nvidia didn't stop
Asus EEE PC 1201N: 12.1 screen, ION, Atom N330 Dual Core, 2GB RAM, 3Lbs. Unique unit
among a field of 11 netbooks.
11 from outside edge of left most key to outside edge of right most key. This of
course is sans-numeric keypad like all other netbook/notebooks. Caveat is chicklet
style keys if
I still can't believe Asus has a RoG 17 laptop with great video CPU for
$1000
AS I just posted, my KB is that width for almost 2/3 less cost half the weight
though not a desktop replacement by any stretch it will give one a run for their
money on battery life video playback.
On
Wired gaming: Razer Salmosa or better
Wireless gaming: all are laggy, even if bluetooth.
Logitech's treatment of MouseWare customers is as appalling as iTouch, enough that I
won't give them any more $$$ and will shaft them for as many warranty replacements as
I can scam for! Have a MX3200
Search the usual Run locations for WelcomeCenter and delete it? There is also
likely a group policy to do so assuming you have something better than Home installed.
On 5/18/2010 1:13 PM, Steve Tomporowski wrote:
Very simply, I've got a system with Win7 where there is no option to get
rid of
Well there is also Network and the abiity to attach a USB DVD-R drive or external
HDD. Personally I do miss the ability to make DVD's on-the-fly, just not enough to
switch to a heavier machine.
On 5/19/2010 1:22 PM, Steve Tomporowski wrote:
Also what I was thinking. Pretty much most netbooks
No, it's a manually initiated operation.
It's likely more efficient to move data off and the back onto a SSD to achieve a
degree of defrag rather than the usual multipass/multimove defrag. MyDefrag has a
script for flash disks and I believe it's suggested to be used sparingly.
SSD's need to
Guess so, seems odd for the reasons stated unless you have a different spectrum
setup. Of course if wiki can be trusted it sounds like France Spain originally
limited use to 1011, 10-13 respectively, so stranger things have happend!
On 5/16/2010 11:21 AM, Naushad Zulfiqar wrote:
Don't forget
I ran AVG free briefly until I noticed throughput issues copying files around my
system. Removing it removed the bottleneck I've never looked back.
Had not noticed MSE taking time to scan nor have I had anything blocked that I am
aware of. Would much rather be using SAV 10.x like I was but
Norton cleaned up? Dunno but the Comcast subsidized N360 is junk, way too much bloat
over reaching protections I don't want.
On 5/16/2010 3:46 PM, FORC5 wrote:
Been messing with AVG paid, not bad. Use Nod32 primarily. Gave up on Norton a
long time ago but have heard good things lately like
Undetected, out of mind is more like it. McAwful has always been just that,
awful.
I assume that's $30/yr?
On 5/17/2010 1:19 AM, Naushad, Zulfiqar wrote:
I decided to download the latest McAfee complete care package.
3 Licenses for 30 dollars. It's a steal.
Performance is great and so far
We only netflix on the PS3 but I've never had an issue with updates or games using
ch6 on the past 3 Linksys routers w/DD-WRT I've used.
Have to wonder if maybe you have interference on ch6 that's making the WII unable to
connect?
On 5/16/2010 10:59 AM, Robert Martin Jr. wrote:
One
That's a look feel review, not a test of it's effectiveness!
On 5/17/2010 6:41 AM, Naushad, Zulfiqar wrote:
http://reviews.cnet.com/internet-security-and-firewall/mcafee-total-prot
ection-2010/4505-3667_7-33768125.html
-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/rap-index.xml
On 5/17/2010 6:52 AM, Naushad, Zulfiqar wrote:
Hows this?
, maccrawj wrote:
Looking for some reading material CHEAP. Anyone have good books on PowerShell
V2.0
that are collecting dust? These $30+ tree sacrifices are just too rich for my
blood
as a one time read / few time reference.
Jeez, still got the various $50 XP/2000 under the hood/scripting books
it was
jDiskDefrag.
On 5/17/2010 6:32 AM, Thane Sherrington wrote:
At 06:21 AM 16/05/2010, maccrawj wrote:
That and a serious defrag using MyDefrag.
Are you using any special scripting with MyDefrag to get better
performance? This looks like a great program - thanks for mentioning it.
T
LOL, as if WA is a bad thing to have? AS posted, you can (as with any program) select
the associated file types to limit what will launch WA.
The embedded NASA video stuff is as bassackwards as their moron managing the RSS for
the NASA picture of the day feed! He of course did not get that the
LOL, just use nLite make a custom install for FREE!
On 5/15/2010 3:11 PM, Veech wrote:
The Slimming Down Windows XP program? Looks good and looks like what
I am looking for. Have you used it? He wants a $15 donation which is
fine with me, it would be worth it.
- Original Message -
That and a serious defrag using MyDefrag.
On 5/15/2010 6:10 PM, Thane Sherrington wrote:
At 09:26 PM 15/05/2010, Veech wrote:
Thanks Thane.. looking forward to seeing what you think. Yes I have a
bunch of music and photo files that I need to archive on disc or my
external drive. But sometimes
Good luck on that, on 2.4ghz there are only 1, 6, 11 that don't overlap and then
factor in the 40mhz vs. 20mhz issue. 1 11 are nearly useless since they don't
provide enough spectrum for 20mhz much less 40mhz.
After years of using Netstumbler to survey, I now use InSSIDer.
On 5/15/2010 12:30
That's nice, have you read anything to back up that assumption? From what I read
@ VirusBulletin MSE is as good as commonly used AV's.
On 5/16/2010 2:44 AM, Naushad, Zulfiqar wrote:
I think that MSE can't be trusted as a primary AV.
I've used it and it gave me a false sense of security. I
Keep knocking, it's coming.
And it's OSX that's holding up not Macs since macs are PC's.
On 5/16/2010 2:56 AM, John R Steinbruner wrote:
As for my Macs, nothing has come close to corrupting them so far... :)
(Knock on wood)
/16/2010 5:40 AM, Thane Sherrington wrote:
At 06:21 AM 16/05/2010, maccrawj wrote:
That and a serious defrag using MyDefrag.
I've never seen Defrag have any impact on performance (and I did a lot
of testing a few years back.) Do you have numbers showing any improvement?
T
Of maccrawj
Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2010 1:00 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Yet another stumbler
Good luck on that, on 2.4ghz there are only 1, 6, 11 that don't overlap
and then
factor in the 40mhz vs. 20mhz issue. 1 11 are nearly useless since
they don't
provide enough
Finally HP putting out something with a decent video card? Can remember wanting the
HDX 20 until I read the video card model. Look at Asus RoG laptops for great video
CPU power, just don't expect any desktop replacement notebook to come light or run long.
Never skimp on video in a laptop
Have you tried unplugging the phone base to see if it's even an issue 1st?
On 5/13/2010 4:27 PM, Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
However, file transfers are about half of what they were
I should point out that I have a 5.8 GHz phone system in there. I note
the range of the 2.4 band is: 2.4 to
Targeted means little if the attack is against Java, Flash, Silverlight, etc...
which stand outside the browser's code.
P2P is general is evil. It's like hanging out 2 signs: attack me, I'm here! Hey
MPAA/RIAA/etc I'm pir8ing over here!. As far as downloading it's an issue if you're
dumb
Or any other method where the pass[hrase doesn't consist of elements that can be
cracked by dictionary attacks.
Common mistake people make is setting up a password vs. passphrase and in either
case further making the mistake of only using alphanumeric limiting entropy to 64
possibilities per
What's the problem Duncan?
On 5/12/2010 12:49 PM, DSinc wrote:
I would like to speak with anyone who understands Mozilla-Thunderbird.
I still like it, sort of.
Mozzy/TBIRD is trying my patience ATM.
I accept total fault now :(
Will admit it may be my DunderHead code-driving ability.
Bothered me when I first upgraded to TB3 but I've gotten use to it. Typically it
stays on unread folders 99% of the time which serves me fine.
SPAM wise nothing unusual here, light flow of new unfiltered, don't check my junk
that often.
On 5/12/2010 1:39 PM, Stan Zaske wrote:
I'm using
Well 32bit I dunno as none of my x32 boxes have more than 2GB. Process Explorer lists
4,192,372 here on Win7 x64.
They adjusted the reported amount for x32 but it was a minor 3GB fractional amount
not to report fake full 4GB.
On 5/12/2010 12:36 PM, Christopher Fisk wrote:
Incorrect
] On Behalf Of maccrawj
Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2010 11:33 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] My 2010 Gamer PC Build
5.9 sounds like the HDD speed bringing you down. My now aging Q6600 gives
me that much, with the rest of the system rating 7.1.
It's been awhile since I've transcoded DVD
Well for home use this sounds like overkill especially if it needs more than a little
12W embedded device to run. I do see where a larger setup could benefit from it, but
that's apples to oranges.
On 5/10/2010 6:41 AM, Greg Sevart wrote:
Yes. You can use pfSense as an access point I think,
, and 7.9 in W7.
-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of maccrawj
Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2010 11:33 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] My 2010 Gamer PC Build
5.9 sounds like the HDD speed bringing you
I just looked quickly and did not find a definitive answer as to which conductor
carries the signal. Neutral being tied to earth ground at the SE would likely eat the
signal IMO.
From what I've seen over the past 30 years with X10 carrier current operated
switches they have the Achilles heel
5.9 sounds like the HDD speed bringing you down. My now aging Q6600 gives me that
much, with the rest of the system rating 7.1.
It's been awhile since I've transcoded DVD but 27min sounds on the high side unless
the GPU is not playing a role.
On 5/9/2010 3:18 PM, Stan Zaske wrote:
Well, I
Well don't have experience with the d-link but real happy with the WRT610N V1
DD-WRT here. Dunno if the V2's are better or worse but they are also supported.
On 5/8/2010 2:29 AM, Naushad, Zulfiqar wrote:
snip
I recommend the WNDR 3700. I have one and it rocks!
snip
Make sure you read up on it vs. the linksys WRT610's!
Oh, and screw apple anything for various reason even if they poop gold eggs!
On 5/9/2010 5:24 AM, Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
Naw...I'll stick with the Netgear that you mentioned. I was just trying
to explain to Duncan about the port and
Could be right, I did not get our theater group to bite on the CMS idea for their
website so never went beyond basic setup tinkering of Joomla. Instead they went
with (LOL) some Intuit WYSIWYG junk @ 4x the monthly cost w/ no granular security
lots of manual page edits.
There are also alternatives to complete page editing in the form of CMS' like Joomla.
Look feel is setup with templates GUI then you only have to manage the content in
blog style.
On 5/5/2010 6:57 PM, FORC5 wrote:
Have always used Frontpage ( because I have it ) and have not really even
It's not a hack it's as legit as any 'nix box with 5 nics + IPTables being
reconfigured based on what I read.
On 5/3/2010 9:00 AM, Robert Martin Jr. wrote:
There's a hack available for a few linksys routers that lets you assign a
different IP range to the 4th ethernet port and keep it
Looks like a great system! Personally I'm firmly an Asus ROG guy but doubt you can go
wrong with Gigabyte.
Consider a BluRay-R/DVD-RW vs. plain DVD-RW. What about sound card? Don't get burnt
by ADI, etc... AC97 crap like I did!
On 5/3/2010 11:58 AM, GPL wrote:
OK, well I see it's time I
Well for stereo mode w/ headset no real advantage above AC97's though some of the
crap mobo makers are using have major driver support issues (ADI Soundmax in my case)
where they don't update the ODM won't release updates either.
As far as bluray I meant if the drives are cheap then having
Well I knew he didn't mean crack but I did assume kludge, NBD.
On 5/3/2010 12:41 PM, Christopher Fisk wrote:
On Mon, 3 May 2010, maccrawj wrote:
It's not a hack it's as legit as any 'nix box with 5 nics + IPTables
being reconfigured based on what I read.
Hack as in clever solution, not hack
Or with the right Linksys DD-Wrt you can group ethernet ports into separate vlans
firewall them from each other.
http://www.geek-pages.com/articles/latest/dd-wrt_-_setting_up_a_separate/isolated_vlan_on_port_4_with_dhcp_3.html
On 5/2/2010 11:16 AM, Winterlight wrote:
You need two more
Not as long as your BIOS has a hardware address space remap option that moves it
above the installed memory. Without BIOS support to remap your assertion would be true.
I have an Asus Rampage, X48 chipset which does this. I have also seen older 64bit
laptops that DO NOT have the BIOS option
Not a bug, that's the Microsoft artificial memory map limit on 32bit OS to
(ostensibly) prevent driver issues caused by brain dead drivers writing to 64bit
addresses as if they were 32bit which is also why x64 is so draconian about signed
drivers! In other words despite PAE MS prevents working
Sounds like mean the dirty bit that forces autochk to run chkdsk on boot but that's
not related to anything antivirus wise.
If you're BSODing even in safemode after any AV repair, then it's likely because now
a system file is corrupted and needs to be replaced with a good copy. You could try
Could be greatest thing since sliced bread but that's not going to get SilverLight on
any of my boxes! Hell I'm still battling fraking M$ adding their other dren to
Firefox without warning.
On 4/30/2010 11:16 PM, CW wrote:
Has anyone played with the new one? Holy cow..
Sorry, your point/counterpoint is? Think I'm missing something here.
On 5/1/2010 7:28 AM, Bryan Seitz wrote:
Well no, I've seen systems with 4G of memory show:
2.5G
2.8G
3.5G
with /PAE
:)
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:30:54AM -0700, maccrawj wrote:
Not a bug, that's the Microsoft artificial
Good info in that link except the PDF for memory hole is very dated (2004) only
hinting at what is now the norm:
Work is being done by the BIOS and/or chip manufacturers that will either remap
physical memory or move device address space in order to eliminate the hole. This
memory hole may be
different on different systems,
all with 4G of ram.
Either way there's no reason to not use a 64 bit os in 2010.
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 10:43:14AM -0700, maccrawj wrote:
Sorry, your point/counterpoint is? Think I'm missing something here.
On 5/1/2010 7:28 AM, Bryan Seitz wrote:
Well no, I've
Not tried, but Daemon Tools?
On 5/1/2010 2:10 PM, Winterlight wrote:
What do you use to mount a BRD iso file? thanks!
If you have 1GB video card it helps a lot moving it above the actual RAM address
space. There are other devices that would also otherwise map onto the 4GB space.
4GB RAM + 512MB video + misc hardware would yield me about 3.25GB under x32 where I
get fill 4.0GB on x64.
On 4/29/2010 7:32 PM,
OK, progress to understanding!
The only manually setup port forwarding you should need is for Samba or NetBios file
sharing which are typically WAN ingress blocked by the router. Normally on
Modem-Router setup this is what you want as every thing on the WAN side is Internet
but in this case
I doubt this TV devices have the need much less ability to allow you to punch in
addresses by IP and if so it would not test the issue which is DNS failing.
On 4/26/2010 1:58 PM, Gaffer wrote:
On Monday 26 April 2010 21:15:17 Winterlight wrote:
Try making a request directly, say
Gaffer was talking about a destination IP not the gateway, IP, DNS values. If the
WD has ability to access local media shares by IP then that would fit the test Gaffer
means (I think).
On 4/28/2010 10:23 AM, Winterlight wrote:
At 02:10 AM 4/28/2010, you wrote:
I doubt this TV devices have
NewsbinPro user for several years now, very good product goor price especially if
you do Giganews' deal. Incorporates compression to maximize throughput on headers, I
get ~70Mb on a 9Mb connection for headers.
If you're not downloading binaries, then it's not the reader for you though.
On
LOL!
On 4/26/2010 6:47 PM, Bryan Seitz wrote:
Yeah basically Chris is Gay. :)
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 06:15:15PM -0700, maccrawj wrote:
Other than RAR I do not know of a format 7Z doesn't write and frankly making
RAR,
Arj, Lzh, whatever files is not a real concern for me in this day age.
Well then all resources are localized per subnet, thus should not be an issue. This
assuming you have linked downstream routers via their WAN ports to LAN ports on the
upstream router and are relaxing downstream routers' firewall rules to allow traffic
in/out their WAN ports to the main SubnetA
Would issuing a route print on the affected machine reveal the result of this? I'm
assuming the 0.0.0.0 is catch-all route for non-VPN traffic.
On 4/25/2010 1:14 PM, Bino Gopal wrote:
Sounds like split tunneling being disabled on the one computer...could that
somehow be set on the VPN
I open JAR files all the time with it, are you sure about that?
On 4/26/2010 1:47 AM, Christopher Fisk wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, maccrawj wrote:
Well 7z Zip have supplanted Rar as defacto standards for downloaded
content with Zip as usual the most common.
If it does Rar, Zip, adds better
Other than RAR I do not know of a format 7Z doesn't write and frankly making RAR,
Arj, Lzh, whatever files is not a real concern for me in this day age.
On 4/26/2010 1:47 AM, Christopher Fisk wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, maccrawj wrote:
Well 7z Zip have supplanted Rar as defacto standards
Spam? Virus? Seems like an odd post!
On 4/24/2010 7:05 PM, al wrote:
http://gedebeq.tripod.com/
So are you firewalling the WAP or just using a separate IP range?
Worse comes to worse, assuming you are double NAT'd with the WAP doing DHCP for it's
subnet. I'd setup the WAP as Gateway, DNS DHCP server and it's DNS client pointing
to gateway router. This should properly forward DNS
OK, let me see if I can clarify the setup here.
Internet-Ethernet-WANPort-Router1-LANPort-Ethernet-WANPort-Router2-LANPort-Ethernet-TVDevice
Router1 WANPort is DHCP Internet
Router1 DNS server is ISP
Router1 is the Gateway and DNS server for all
Router2 is DHCP server for SubnetA
Router2
I'd say that's likely part of it!
On 4/24/2010 3:36 AM, Gaffer wrote:
On Friday 23 April 2010 23:33:50 Winterlight wrote:
OK, now I have replaced that router = Linksys WG54 with another
Linksys WG54 that I updated the firmware on and checked it out as
working well. Then I set it up for my
LOL only if you're nuts enough to buy from Sapphire!
On 4/23/2010 3:26 AM, Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
This is the hardware group, right. At least that's what they told me
about the 6-monitor setup. :)
Perhaps you need one of these too:
Actually with Stalker:CoP I'm wishing I had an SSD to run it from. It real-time
streams the game data from the HDD causing all sorts of issues if the HDD can't keep
up. Multipass defragging is slowly helping but I see good reason to go back to the
days of multiple 500GB partitions each serving
I too use 7Z V9.xx as my primary archive program, great software,
On 4/23/2010 12:24 PM, DSinc wrote:
7-zip opinions sought!
I use 7-zip v465. !So much nicer than WinZip!
I just found 7-Zip v913-beta :)
Is v913-beta good to go for a ride?
TNX,
Duncan
Well 7z Zip have supplanted Rar as defacto standards for downloaded content with
Zip as usual the most common.
If it does Rar, Zip, adds better compressing 7z format, and incorporates all the
positives / none of the negatives you mention then one would have to question why
use use WinRAR at
Do you get a status page on the TV devices that shows what DNS server they are trying
to use like ipconfig /all does for windows?
Do they rely on uPnp?
If you plug a laptop into the network cable one of the TV devices are using, does it
work properly?
Lastly, if: A. you have the ability to
Bullshit! 500-600 is just cutting it for MOST current cards combined with the
potential needs of up to 6 hdd's modern mobo's are capable of never mind what other
power hungry components are installed.
* Don't skip on PSU brand or capacity, it saves no real money in the end.
* Always lookup
D. Won't be unsupported by it's manufacturer tomorrow.
Personally I loved my circa 2000 Advanced Gravis Aftershock controllers but they
never got the drivers right and were devoured by another megacorp uninterested in
further development nor open sourcing the existing code. I see the same
With 3rd party firmware it should be simple enough to disable the N's firewall +
DHCP, then map the WAN + LAN ports as eth0 bridged with wifi. Setup this way yields 6
port switch w/ wifi AP.
If you wanted to be fancy you could leave FW enabled to isolate the N wifi.
On 4/18/2010 10:08 PM,
wrote:
You're seriously mistaken my friend. 600 watts is more than adequate for
most builds and overkill in many cases.
On 4/20/2010 2:29 AM, maccrawj wrote:
Bullshit! 500-600 is just cutting it for MOST current cards combined
with the potential needs of up to 6 hdd's modern mobo's are capable
So how many amps @12V do those devices total up to on paper?
What does the KoW measure the load at when running a game? Prime95?
On 4/20/2010 7:30 AM, Winterlight wrote:
Well, I am. I run a Q9650 over clocked with 8GB of DDR2, a 4950 and a
5750, two SSDs four hard drives, two optical, a floppy
If you read the reviews for the 3 models: 850TX, 950TX, 850HX you'll find the 950TX
850HX are same generation technology while the TX850 is older.
HX has modular cables 7 year warranty.
On 4/20/2010 7:06 AM, GPL wrote:
I read what you folks are saying, but I keep going back after my
Bah, Antec, bad company with questionable history quality that does not own up to
their mistakes! They could give away their products and I would decline!
On 4/18/2010 3:11 PM, Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
I have that Antec p182. I can route cable behind the mobo with it. It's
a good case, too.
Good price, nice layout, yet sorely lacking mandatory (IMHO) side bottom cooling
fans. My feeling is PSU on bottom design is better for PSU temp lifespan, a
detriment for overall case temp especially the card cage area.
On 4/17/2010 10:29 AM, GPL wrote:
At the moment, I seem to be leaning
LOL, no I do so to avoid further loss from dealing with them as I am already out a
fair bit of coin.
On 4/19/2010 4:01 AM, Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
Then you'd do so at your own loss.
On 4/19/2010 3:49 AM, maccrawj wrote:
Bah, Antec, bad company with questionable history quality that does
1 - 100 of 527 matches
Mail list logo
