Re: [H] Nas 3.0

2013-07-08 Thread Chris Reeves
...@lists.hardwaregroup.com hardw...@lists.hardwaregroup.com Subject: Re: [H] Nas 3.0 flexraid is zfs-based? On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Chris Reeves tmse...@rlrnews.com wrote: I ended up going with flexraid. So far, very happy with it. 18tb avail in one array and 26tb in the other. All good so far

Re: [H] Nas 3.0

2013-07-08 Thread Bryan Seitz
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 12:29:36 -0400, Chris Reeves tmse...@rlrnews.com wrote: Flexraid.com Seems sorta like ghetto-raid, ie S3 type object replication. Decent idea though given you can have replicates and if you have a 'lose 1 drive past a raid level' type scenario, you really only lose

Re: [H] Nas 3.0

2013-07-08 Thread DSinc
a drive fail last night. Flawless recovery. Nice. -Original Message- From: Alex Lee a...@kukaki.net Sent: âEURZ(7/âEURZ(7/âEURZ(2013 8:40 PM To: hardw...@lists.hardwaregroup.com hardw...@lists.hardwaregroup.com Subject: Re: [H] Nas 3.0 flexraid is zfs-based? On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 6:37

Re: [H] Nas 3.0

2013-07-08 Thread Brian Weeden
...@lists.hardwaregroup.com Subject: Re: [H] Nas 3.0 flexraid is zfs-based? On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Chris Reeves tmse...@rlrnews.com wrote: I ended up going with flexraid. So far, very happy with it. 18tb avail in one array and 26tb in the other. All good so far. -Original Message

Re: [H] Nas 3.0

2013-07-07 Thread Bryan Seitz
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 05:14:00AM -0700, Tim Lider wrote: I have not done a project like that . When I price out a NAS project it is actually less expensive (when you think of equipment and time) to get one premade. The NAS' we use are WD's right now. The boss also does not like to have the

Re: [H] Nas 3.0

2013-07-07 Thread Chris Reeves
: Re: [H] Nas 3.0 On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 05:14:00AM -0700, Tim Lider wrote: I have not done a project like that . When I price out a NAS project it is actually less expensive (when you think of equipment and time) to get one premade. The NAS' we use are WD's right now. The boss also does not like

Re: [H] Nas 3.0

2013-07-07 Thread Alex Lee
: 7/7/2013 6:45 PM To: hardw...@lists.hardwaregroup.com hardw...@lists.hardwaregroup.com Subject: Re: [H] Nas 3.0 On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 05:14:00AM -0700, Tim Lider wrote: I have not done a project like that . When I price out a NAS project it is actually less expensive (when you think

Re: [H] Nas 3.0

2013-07-05 Thread Tim Lider
I have not done a project like that . When I price out a NAS project it is actually less expensive (when you think of equipment and time) to get one premade. The NAS' we use are WD's right now. The boss also does not like to have the TB size of the NAS' too large, I limit the size to around 8TB to

[H] Nas 3.0

2013-07-04 Thread Chris Reeves
Tim- I'm weighing redoing my home NAS I'm thinking about either going with FlexRAID or Storage Spaces. Right now it would be two pools, about 30tb each. I'm just going to demote the old whs and convert it to NAS4free and make it a backup target. I'm somewhat drawn to Flexraids logic of

Re: [H] Nas 3.0

2013-07-04 Thread Julian Zottl
Take a look at Nexenta and FreeNAS too! Julian Sent from my iProduct, cause I'm iSpecial But not in that ishort bus kind of way... On Jul 4, 2013, at 3:51 PM, Chris Reeves tmse...@rlrnews.com wrote: Tim- I'm weighing redoing my home NAS I'm thinking about either going with FlexRAID

Re: [H] Nas 3.0

2013-07-04 Thread Chris Reeves
over about 4-5tb for nas4free to run under esxi. -Original Message- From: Julian Zottl jzo...@radiantnetworks.net Sent: ‎7/‎4/‎2013 4:12 PM To: hardw...@lists.hardwaregroup.com hardw...@lists.hardwaregroup.com Subject: Re: [H] Nas 3.0 Take a look at Nexenta and FreeNAS too! Julian Sent