Now for something completely different:
is a OLPC / Pixel Qi type reflective LCD an option?
http://www.pixelqi.com
uwe
___
hardware mailing list
hardware@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/hardware
I think it would be great.
1) Low power.
2) High BW resolution
3) Sun light readability
Regards,
Joop.
Now for something completely different:
is a OLPC / Pixel Qi type reflective LCD an option?
http://www.pixelqi.com
uwe
___
hardware
Uwe Klein wrote:
Now for something completely different:
is a OLPC / Pixel Qi type reflective LCD an option?
http://www.pixelqi.com
I've been thinking the same thing. The poor daylight readability is the
only thing I don't like about the current screen, and is a real issue
when it's on
+1
for some sort of transflexive screen that displays (a maybe somewhat reduced
set of) information without backlit.
/j
Am Do 30. Oktober 2008 schrieb Alastair Johnson:
Uwe Klein wrote:
Now for something completely different:
is a OLPC / Pixel Qi type reflective LCD an option?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
BTW It's great that Openmoko puts this much effort in having a
mainline acceptable SDK but it's very hard to catch up with the years
of support by community and vendors on OMAP meaning that every little
quirk of the
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Pritam Ghanghas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 6:02 PM, thomasg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Andy Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
No -- I mean that GTA02 has risc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thomasg wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Andy Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steady on, that OMAP device is marginally slower vs s3c6410 CPU, 600 vs
633MHz. And it's hard to say that Samsung doesn't care
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 6:02 PM, thomasg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Andy Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
No -- I mean that GTA02 has risc coprocessors too like the OMAP
discussed here, they are not automatically
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
No -- I mean that GTA02 has risc coprocessors too like the OMAP
discussed here, they are not automatically any benefit unless they are
actually deployed to do something was the point. I don't think it's any
secret we likely won't be using the
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Andy Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thomasg wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Andy Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steady on, that OMAP device is marginally slower vs s3c6410
If the Neo has a larger 800x480 screen and uses the OMAP 3530, it will
be startlingly similar to the upcoming Nokia internet tablet (the
successor to N810):
http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS9093153240.html
It might make differentiation of Openmoko's product trickier.
On the other hand, there
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Tomasz Czapiewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've been looking at the Samsung mobile CPUs/SoC list and then I've
searched the web for something simmilar/better...
And I've found OMAP 3530 which is used by BeagleBoard.
By reading the specification of the
12 matches
Mail list logo
