#755: GHC 6.4.2 crashes frequently on OSX Tiger 10.4.6
-+--
Reporter: guest |Owner:
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: high |Milestone: 6.4.2
Component:
#755: GHC 6.4.2 crashes frequently on OSX Tiger 10.4.6
---+
Reporter: guest | Owner:
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: high | Milestone: 6.4.2
Component:
On 24 April 2006 15:56, Christian Maeder wrote:
Simon Marlow wrote:
Ok, does this help instead (compile stage1 with this change):
*** DriverState.hs.~1.116.2.2.~2005-10-13 10:02:19.0
+0100 --- DriverState.hs2006-04-13 15:32:02.0 +0100
***
*** 418,423
Hello,
It is now official. Haskell.org is a mentoring organization for this
year's Summer of Code programme.
You can see it listed on the official site http://code.google.com/soc/
clicking on `Haskell.org (ideas)' you'll be directed to the trac site we
are setting up. (It's 4 AM and I've
Hello,
Does the parallel list comprahension notation support guards that
involve both variables that are being generated? I was trying to
write something that is essentially:
[ f x y | (x,y) - zip xs ys, p x y ]
and I thought that it would be nice to rewrite it as a parallel list
comprahension,
The pipermail archives deleted my previous attachment because it had a .hs
extension (!!! :-) ), so I've renamed it to .txt so that it will persist for
the future of the earth evolution (who needs an expensive burial plot when
you can just write a Haskell module instead).
It is also now
Hello Haskell Hackers,
I am trying to create a wxHaskell program which, while the GUI is
active, enables the user to type arbitrary haskell program fragments to
interact with the GUI.
Initially I thought I would run the wxHaskell main loop in a different
thread, and interact via the GHCI main
I was thinking about the dynamic behavior of par, and there's something
that's a little confusing to me. Am I right in understanding that (x
`par` y) evaluates to y, and may or may not evaluate x along the way?
I think it would be easier to reason about if we knew that x would be
evaluated,
Hello,
It is now official. Haskell.org is a mentoring organization for this
year's Summer of Code programme.
You can see it listed on the official site http://code.google.com/soc/
clicking on `Haskell.org (ideas)' you'll be directed to the trac site we
are setting up. (It's 4 AM and I've
John Meacham wrote:
* every runnable thread is guarenteed to run in a finite amount of time if a
program reaches a yield-point infinitly often.
What happens if one of the thread ends up in an infinite loop that
contains a yield point?
Infinitely often is unclear (I think I know what
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 09:40:58AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
Admittedly I haven't tried this route (not including *any* external
headers at all when compiling .hc files). It might be possible, but you
lose the safety net of compiler-checked calls.
yeah, perhaps a hybrid approach of some
On 24 April 2006 15:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps (just a quick first attempt to get the idea across):
{-# INCLUDE_PRIVATE foo/bar.h foobar.o #-}
{-# INCLUDE_PACKAGE foo/bar.h -lfoobar #-}
I would have considered allowing just
{-# INCLUDE_PRIVATE foo/bar.h foobar #-}
I
On 25 April 2006 09:51, John Meacham wrote:
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 09:40:58AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
Admittedly I haven't tried this route (not including *any* external
headers at all when compiling .hc files). It might be possible, but
you lose the safety net of compiler-checked calls.
John Meacham [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Foreign concurrent calls, handle IO, and all IO actions that directly
interact with the world outside the current process all must be
yield-points. (in addition to any yield-points implied by the progress
guarentee)
If an IO call includes a long
On 25 April 2006 10:48, Duncan Coutts wrote:
One downside would be that we would only be able to call C functions
which conform to the standard platform ABI. As it is at the moment
(perhaps somewhat by accident) we can call C functions that have
non-standard ABI annotations in their
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:
I would prefer otherwise. Every implementation supports it, which
proves that it's useful. And it's no less unsafe than FFI.
It's not a matter just of safety, it's a matter of whether its use
should be encouraged. FFI is clearly the right thing sometimes,
It was pointed out that you can't necessarily know what routines to
avoid in unsafePerformIO without mandating certain things _don't_ use
concurrency, rather than that, how about the following:
Whether an implementation can yield to another thread inside an
unsafePerformIO action is
Evan Martin ha scritto:
(This is Evan from Google.)
Just wanted to say that it's rad to see you making all this happen.
Hi Evan!
Fabulous to see you around!
Thank you very much, we have done great work last year. Google is doing
so well making students able to work on what they like most,
Hello,
it's really great to hear that Haskell.org is participating in SoC.
I'm planning to try myself as a student in writing an ATOM/RSS
aggregator in Haskell (I'm really tired of not being able to find a
good one, and also I'd like to learn Haskell as well), still I'm open
to other great
Hi,
All this chatter about the Summer of Code has inspired me to throw caution
to the wind and become more committed to an idea I had for a Haskell project.
I first thought to apply this to Python, but well, Haskell stole
my heart. I wanted to throw the idea out there and see if anyone
Hello,
It is now official. Haskell.org is a mentoring organization for this
year's Summer of Code programme.
You can see it listed on the official site http://code.google.com/soc/
clicking on `Haskell.org (ideas)' you'll be directed to the trac site we
are setting up. (It's 4 AM and I've
21 matches
Mail list logo
