Bjorn Lisper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
cos+sin-- intent: \x-((cos x)+(sin x))
cos(sin) -- intent: \x-cos(sin(x))
have equivalents in Fortran 90 and HPF, although with arrays rather than
functions. For instance, one can write "A+B" to mean an array with value
But I'd
Jan Skibinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
then take half of its norm; 1/2 * sqrt (r1^2 + r2^2 + r3^2).
In his problem, not even that is necessary: Just taking the
z-component is enough (or even better if the big polygon is not
convex).
It will fail if the polygon is not plane, but then
"Craig Dickson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree, and would add (if I'm recalling correctly) that LISP lacks lexical
scoping, which may not be an absolute requirement for functional programming
Some old dead lisps might lack lexical scoping, at least CL has it
since a long time. The only
Sebastian Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John Peterson wrote:
Or you can just set USE_DOUBLE_PRECISION in options.h if you want to
I did that (to be precise, I had to do it every time when building
hugs :-( ).
pi::Double is defined by the prelude as primPiDouble, and this
seems to be
Julian Assange [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
complex-tecture pov-ray picture distributed to a 56 bit IEEE machine
and a 64 bit one. The when the picture elements are stitched back
Is this really due to color differences of the order of 10^-17, or
rather due to different libc-inherited random
Ronny Wichers Schreur schrieb:
If you think of the (types of) functions as domino stones,
|. makes them fit.
And if I call the label on the stones "integer_from_string"
and "integer_from_intlist", unflipped (.) does as well.
The same applies to the other answers: On could write
f . g (which
Lennart Augustsson wrote:
It's not hard to find a text editor, use w.g. wily. It's widely available.
But it is hard to use some nonstandard (i.e. neither vi nor emacs)
editor just for one special kind of source code - it means to lose
all the keybindings, highlight settings,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
set up comp.lang.haskell?
I agree with the above.
This is IMHO the best solution for a lot of reasons:
1. With many providers/client_softwares, you cannot ignore
a mail without downloading and deleting it. This makes it
hard to ignore a thread which one is not
S.D.Mechveliani wrote:
Thus, the recent example with the Cryptarithm solver was a very
in-correct comparison, due to the unknown permutation generating
order.
I did not study the problem in detail, but I think giving it
an unsolvable puzzle would force it to try *all* permutations,
thus
Today I saw a strange behavior of primShiftInt in hugs98
(and all other functions which are implemented using the
operators " or "").
The effect is that an expression like "x y" in C behaves
as if it were x (y 0x001F).
E.g. 64 68 gives 4 instead of 0.
I tried this with different versions of
chris angus wrote:
I was under the impression that Haskell the language (and by inference any
definition
of Haskell) were "free", period. i.e. may be distributed freely in a GNU/GPL
manner.
is this not correct?
As Fergus already said, something becomes free only if all
of its authors
11 matches
Mail list logo
