We are happy to announce that the next Dutch functional programming day will
take place on January 6, 2012, at the university campus de Uithof of Utrecht
University.
The program, participants registered thus far, and further details can be found
at:
and made me a
lot more productive.
A happy new year 2012 for Haskell hacking to everyone!
Many greets,
Ertugrul
--
nightmare = unsafePerformIO (getWrongWife = sex)
http://ertes.de/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Regarding standardization:
My suggestion to standardize Haskell was not a near-term thing,
but rather long-term; in particular there's no sense putting a
lot of effort into standardizing 1.X if we know that 2.0 is less
than a few years away.
In any case, the process is tedious and is
I'm against it, but I should note that Scheme is an IEEE standard,
and *that* took far less than a decade and didn't destroy anything.
So I'd say: if you're going to do a std at all, start w/ an IEEE
one. Also, it may be easier to make an ISO std from an existing
std (there's a "fast
Continuing Simon Peyton Jones' points on the State of Haskell:
| Standardization
| ---
| As painful as it may be, I think that we need to formally standardize
| Haskell via one or more of the standard standardization organizations.
I'm more dubious about this. I have
Continuing Simon Peyton Jones' points on the State of Haskell:
| Standardization
| ---
| As painful as it may be, I think that we need to formally standardize
| Haskell via one or more of the standard standardization organizations.
I'm more dubious about this. I have not met
In response to Paul Hudak's letter regarding modifications to Haskell,
we are interested in the question of the addition of 'records'.
Working from an unpublished paper by Sean Bechhofer we have developed
a system of extensible records for Gofer/Haskell. This is based not on
subtyping but
