> >> function. Sadly, most htmlizers are focused on highlighting
> >> rather than navigation.
..
> I said "most"! :) (To be honest, I thought about "all")
just wanted to point out that there have been several hyperlinking
HTML documentation generators for Haskell (in fact, from memory
I'm quite
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 07:29:13PM +, C.Reinke wrote:
>
>> 2. When I hear "translate to HTML" I imagine that underlined
>> words which can be clicked to see, say, definition of
>> function. Sadly, most htmlizers are focused on highlighting
>> rather than navigation.
>
> Why generate HTML pa
Max Kirillov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote,
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 03:05:34PM +1100, Manuel M. T. Chakravarty wrote:
> > Again, XEmacs with the above mentioned Haskell mode can do
> > it. Just execute the function `htmlize-buffer' on a buffer
> > containing the Haskell source. As an example for
> 2. When I hear "translate to HTML" I imagine that underlined
> words which can be clicked to see, say, definition of
> function. Sadly, most htmlizers are focused on highlighting
> rather than navigation.
Why generate HTML pages if noone reads them?-)
Take this obscure location, for instance
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 03:05:34PM +1100, Manuel M. T. Chakravarty wrote:
> Again, XEmacs with the above mentioned Haskell mode can do
> it. Just execute the function `htmlize-buffer' on a buffer
> containing the Haskell source. As an example for the
> generated output, have a look at
>
> htt
"Robert Giegerich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote,
> I often use Haskell demos in teaching algorithms. The problem is that this
> does not integrate well with the rest of the material, e.g. lecture
> notes or slides in PDF or HTML. I'd like to integrate explanations and
> demos and explorative changes
tor 2002-03-14 klockan 08.02 skrev Ketil Z. Malde:
> "Manuel M. T. Chakravarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The detailed choice of colours is, of course, adjustable.
> > At least on a Unix machine, I am quite sure you can use
> > XEmacs also in batch mode to generate the HTML
>
> Sure. Ha
"Manuel M. T. Chakravarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The detailed choice of colours is, of course, adjustable.
> At least on a Unix machine, I am quite sure you can use
> XEmacs also in batch mode to generate the HTML
Sure. Have a look at -batch, -f and -eval options. Be prepared for a
bit
"Robert Giegerich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote,
> I often use Haskell demos in teaching algorithms. The problem is that this
> does not integrate well with the rest of the material, e.g. lecture
> notes or slides in PDF or HTML. I'd like to integrate explanations and
> demos and explorative changes
> Is there something like a Hugs plugin for Netscape?
We used to have one at Yale. Can't remember what happened to it so I'm
adding John Peterson to the address list in case he can remember.
--
Alastair ReidReid Consulting (UK) Ltd
___
Hask
Vim can produce HTML from any source code it has highlighting rules for,
which includes Haskell. Dunno about the browser plugin, though.
Abe
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Robert Giegerich wrote:
> Teachers in Haskell,
>
> I often use Haskell demos in teaching algorithms. The problem is that this
> doe
Teachers in Haskell,
I often use Haskell demos in teaching algorithms. The problem is that this
does not integrate well with the rest of the material, e.g. lecture
notes or slides in PDF or HTML. I'd like to integrate explanations and
demos and explorative changes to algorithms. This needs better
12 matches
Mail list logo
