Re: TclHaskell manual woes...

1999-08-16 Thread Keith Wansbrough
I wrote: > Looking forward to a LaTeX or Linuxdoc-DTD version of the > documentation, or at least HTML that passes WebLint and the HTML > validator: I wrote that, and yet sent a message that would surely fail any RFC822-lint program. Sorry about the long lines, everyone... Thanks Matthias f

Re: TclHaskell manual woes...

1999-08-15 Thread Matthias Kilian
>Looking forward to a LaTeX or Linuxdoc-DTD version of the documentation, I've done the initial conversion to LaTeX, i.e. it passes a LaTeX run and may be converted and printed using dvips. pdflatex also seems to work. However, I've to proof-read it, improve layout, set proper crossreferences, pr

Re: TclHaskell manual woes...

1999-08-15 Thread Keith Wansbrough
> Jonatan, > > I can read doc/usermanual.html in Netscape 4.5 under Linux > and Netscape 4.07 without any problems... > > Grigoriy. Are you sure? If you check Tcl.hs, you'll see that the command for creating a window with a given name is not window? as the documentation says, but window'

Re: TclHaskell manual woes...

1999-08-14 Thread Grigoriy Strokin
Jonatan, I can read doc/usermanual.html in Netscape 4.5 under Linux and Netscape 4.07 without any problems... Grigoriy. On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Jonathan King wrote: > > TclHaskell was just announced here, and I grabbed the distribution this > morning. I was very eager to get started messing ar

TclHaskell manual woes...

1999-08-13 Thread Jonathan King
TclHaskell was just announced here, and I grabbed the distribution this morning. I was very eager to get started messing around with this, but the TclHaskell manual is distributed as a Microsoft Word document which I can't use and as a file that purports to be HTML. By "purports" I mean that my