On Sat, 2005-03-05 at 22:15 +0100, Sebastian Sylvan wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 17:03:38 +, Duncan Coutts > module Graphics.UI.Gtk (
> > qualified module Graphics.UI.Gtk.Button as Button,
> > ...
>
> I like this idea a lot!
Great. We "just" have to persuade other people around here of th
On Sun, 2005-03-06 at 01:29 +0100, Benjamin Franksen wrote:
> On Saturday 05 March 2005 20:06, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> > It does mean that as I library author I'm sort of forcing you to use
> > qualified names when perhaps you did not want to. But for some libraries
> > you really can't sensibly use
On Sunday 06 March 2005 13:23, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-03-06 at 01:29 +0100, Benjamin Franksen wrote:
> > On Saturday 05 March 2005 20:06, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> > > It does mean that as I library author I'm sort of forcing you to use
> > > qualified names when perhaps you did not want
Hello,
On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 12:21:01 +, Duncan Coutts
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-03-05 at 22:15 +0100, Sebastian Sylvan wrote:
> > On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 17:03:38 +, Duncan Coutts > module Graphics.UI.Gtk (
> > > qualified module Graphics.UI.Gtk.Button as Button,
> > > ...
>
On 06/03/2005, at 11:23 PM, Duncan Coutts wrote:
We can do it too except that to use qualified names, users would have
to
import dozens of modules:
import Graphics.UI.Gtk.This
import Graphics.UI.Gtk.That
import Graphics.UI.Gtk.TheOther.
Not that this is a fantastic solution (and perhaps you're doi
