Re: What's the most efficient way to build an array?

1992-08-10 Thread kff
On building more than one array at a time: You could introduce references into the language. This would make it possible to write code that manipulates more than one array at a time. There may however creep up some problems if those references were to escape the continuation passing region of th

bogus array signature (was What's the most efficient ... etc.)

1992-08-10 Thread Stephen J Bevan
I wrote: In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Isn't the type signature you give incorrect? The parammeters m and n must have type a (where (a,a) is the index types of the arrays). I think your right, but as I can't seem to get to g

Re: What's the most efficient way to build an array?

1992-08-10 Thread Stephen J Bevan
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Because if we really want sequentialization of the accesses and reuse of storage, we can (soon) use array transformers (cps), linear typesystems or perhaps array monads to express this at the source level. Will this be true if